Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 93 - 93
1 Jul 2012
Kempshall P Guro R Lewis M Mintowt-Czyz W Chandratreya A Roy W
Full Access

Aims

Wales in collaboration with the Welsh Assembly Government, has attempted to start a national ligament register.

Introduction

Norway is the lead in Europe for running a successful national quality knee ligament registry. As yet there is no UK wide registry encompassing all forms of knee ligament surgery. The issue has been discussed at previous society meetings, but no consensus has been reached.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 176 - 176
1 May 2011
Nazir A Cragg J Roy W
Full Access

Introduction: Meniscal tears are common and arise as a result of mainly trauma either isolated or on top of longstanding degeneration. The symptoms are restrictive and prompt diagnosis and intervention restores function and improves prognosis dramatically with long-term symptomatic relief

Purpose: Routinely diagnosing meniscal pathology via MRI is becoming commonplace, even on the background of a clear meniscal history and examination. MRI is useful in excluding tumours but evidence suggests that this can be done with an up-to-date plain x-ray. The aim of this study is to evaluate the routine practice of two knee surgeons in a District General Hospital commonly performing knee arthroscopies.

Method: A retrospective case note analysis 18/01/2007 to 2/12/2008. Patients were selected from the arthroscopy lists of two knee surgeons one largely MRI scanning the other proceeding more on clinical acumen to arthroscopy. Cohort cross-examined, isolating those with a clinical suspicion of meniscal pathology with an intention to treat on initial presentation. Suspected concurrent ACL pathology were excluded. This gave us a group of patients with likely meniscal injury that would ultimately be likely to be scoped so we could retrospectively evaluate the usefulness of MRI, in addition to clinical suspicion in detecting meniscal pathology. Clinical suspicion assumed on presence/absence of 5 key meniscal features i.e Pain, Locking, Effusion, Joint line tenderness (medial and lateral), McMurrays test positive (medial and lateral).

Results: The results in summary:

124 arthroscopy patients

Mean age of the cohort was 47.7 (19–81) mostly male 2.5:1

2 patients not scanned had a negative arthroscopy

Some specific and some sensitive signs and symptoms

Pain and Joint line tenderness – high sensitivity

McMurray’s and Locking – high specificity

Combine into a scoring system (/5)

Shows good positive correlation with specificity (up to 97%)

Shows good negative correlation with sensitivity

Both with increasing score

MRI scanning delays operation by a mean of 45 days (6 ½ weeks)

Total cost of investigating and treating meniscal pathology estimated at £202,500 per year

Costs can be reduced by using a cut off score for scanning of 3/5

Conclusion:

○ MRI showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for meniscal tears

○ Should be reserved for those with boarder-line clinical scores < 3/5 whom cannot be either operated on directly or have meniscal pathology confidently excluded on clinical grounds with ~83% certainty if > 4/5.

○ Clinical findings, in combination, can accurately guide treatment

○ Some signs display high specificity and others high sensitivity. ~83% certainty if > 4/5.

○ Border-line cases falling short on inclusion criteria should be investigated further (MRI) but:

Long waiting times will delay arthroscopy by 45 days (6½ weeks).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 463 - 463
1 Aug 2008
Talwalkar N Roy W Johnson S
Full Access

The process of training orthopaedic registrars in the technique of lower limb arthroplasty (hip & knee) requires a long learning curve. The practice of consultant supervised operating should not compromise the final outcome and patient care.

The aim of this study was to compare complication rates of lower limb arthroplasties performed by orthopaedic trainees with the national average.

We reviewed specialist registrar operating over a one year period between January 2003–January 2004 with reference to lower limb arthroplasty surgery (hip and knee replacements).

A postal questionnaire was sent to 24 specialist registrars on The Welsh Orthopaedic Higher Training Programme in confidence. Complications enquired about were:

infection;

deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism;

dislocation.

Data obtained was analysed and individual complication rates were compared with the national United Kingdom average.

Complication rates for registrar operated patients were comparable if not lower than the national average. Outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty did not differ between consultants and trainees with regards to complications.

The authors conclude that consultant supervised lower limb arthroplasties performed by trainee orthopaedic surgeons is safe and not associated with higher complication rates as one would believe.