Neurological examination in children presenting with upper limb fractures is often poorly performed. We aimed to assess the quality of documented neurological examination in children presenting with upper limb fractures and whether this could be improved following introduction of a simple guideline for paediatric neurological assessment. We reviewed the clinical notes of all children presenting to the emergency department with upper limb fractures over a three month period. Documentation of initial neurological assessment and clinical suspicion of any nerve injury were noted. Subsequently, we introduced a guideline for paediatric upper limb neurological examination (‘Rock, Paper, Scissors, OK’) to our own hospital and performed a further 3 month clinical review to detect any resulting change in practice. In the initial study period, 121 patients presented with upper limb fractures. 10 children (8%) had a nerve injury. Neurological examination was documented in 107 (88%) of patients, however, none of the nerve injuries were detected on initial assessment. In patients with nerve injuries, 5 (50%) were documented as being ‘neurovascularly intact’ and 2 (20%) had no documented examination. Following introduction of the guideline, 97 patients presented with upper limb fractures of which 8 children (8%) had a nerve injury. Documentation of neurological examination increased to 98% for patients presenting directly to our own hospital (p=0.02). Within this cohort all nerve injuries with objective motor or sensory deficits were detected on initial examination. Introduction of a simple guideline for neurological examination in children with upper limb fractures can significantly improve the quality of documented neurological assessment and detection of nerve injuries.
Neurological examination in children presenting with upper limb fractures is often poorly performed. In the peripatetic emergency department environment this may be confounded by patient distress or reduced comprehension. We aimed to assess the quality of documented neurological examination in children presenting with upper limb fractures and whether this could be improved following introduction of a simple guideline for paediatric neurological assessment. We reviewed the clinical notes of all children presenting to the emergency department with upper limb fractures over a three month period. Documentation of initial neurological assessment and clinical suspicion of any nerve injury were noted. Subsequently, we introduced a guideline for paediatric upper limb neurological examination (‘Rock, Paper, Scissors, OK’) to our hospital and performed a further 3 month review to detect resulting changes in practice. In the initial study period, 121 children presented with upper limb fractures. 10 (8%) had a nerve injury. Neurological examination was documented in 107 (88%) of patients. However, information on nerves examined was only recorded in 5 (5%) with the majority (85%) documented as ‘neurovascuarly intact’. None of the nerve injuries were detected on initial assessment. Following guideline introduction, 97 patients presented with upper limb fractures of which 8 children (8%) had a nerve injury. Documentation of neurological examination increased to 98% for patients presenting directly to our own hospital (Fisher's Exact Test, p=0.02) with details of nerves examined increasing to 69%. Within this cohort all nerve injuries with objective motor or sensory deficits were detected on initial examination. The recent British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guideline on peripheral nerve injuries emphasises the importance of clearly recorded neurological assessment in trauma patients. Our study shows that introduction of a simple guideline for neurological examination in children with upper limb fractures can significantly improve the quality of documented neurological assessment and detection of nerve injuries.
