Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 314 - 314
1 Mar 2004
Rimtautas G Kalesinskas R Kunigiškis G Puod°ius D Kaunas VA
Full Access

Aims: To compare mosaicplasty with microfractures in the knee joint osteochondral defects treatment. Methods: Between 1998 and 2001 twenty-three patients underwent mosaicplasty and 23 patients (controls) microfracture procedures for the knee joint osteochondral or chondral pathology treatment. Patients were selected and evaluated randomly through ICRS and modiþed HSS scales, arthroscopicaly, histologically, rent-genologicaly and with MRI. Average follow-up was 12,4(range 10–14 months) and 23,6 months (range 22 –25 months). Results: The defect-size in these patients ranged between 12 mm2 and 23 mm2 in diameter and had an average-size of 15 mm2. 22(95,6%)mosaicplasty results were excellent and good at the time of last follow-up. 16(69,5%) in the control group results were excellent and good and 7(30,4%) Ð fair 23,6 months post operations. Modiþed ICRS and HSS evaluations showed statistically signiþcantly better results in the mosaic-plasty group at the 12,4 and 23,6 months (p< 0.005; p< 0.0001) post operations. Last follow-up showed deterioration in microfracture group (p< 0,02). Conclusions: Mosaicplasty can be recommended for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the weight-bearing area of the knee as a safe procedure for transplantation of hyaline cartilage.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 372 - 373
1 Mar 2004
Rimtautas G Kalesinskas R Kunigi¸kis G
Full Access

Aims: Retrospective study comparing long term results after excision of osteochondral defects of the knee joint in different age groups. Methods: Fiftytwo patients with osteochondritis dissecans lesions were evaluated between 7 and 25 years after excision of a partially detached or loose fragment from the medial femoral condyles. Average follow-up was 17,2(range 7–25 years). Two groups with the same defect size and activity level during procedures were made, with 31 patients in þrst and 21 Ð in the second group. The only difference between the groups was the age; the age average in the þrst group was Ð 25,6 years (range 15 to 35 years), and Ð 45,2 years (range 35 to 55 years) in the second group. Patients were evaluated through ICRS, modiþed HSS and KOOS scales, and with x-rays. Results: Evaluation with the ICRS, modiþed HSS and KOOS rating scales for osteochondritis dissecans revealed Ð 9(17%) good results, 32(62%) Ð fair, and 11(21%) Ð failure results. Final ICRS and modiþed HSS evaluation showed statistically signiþcantly better results in the younger patients group at the 21 years (p< 0.04). At an average 17,2 year follow-up x-rays and KOOS evaluation form showed initial and second-degree (according to AhlbŠck) osteoarthritis signs in the knees. Conclusions: The long-term results of the excision of osteochondral defects of the knee joint are poor. We recommend autologous osteochondral grafting for the replacement of the osteochondritis dissecans defects in the knee joint.