To study the outcome of complex proximal humeral fracture sequelae (Type 3 &
4) treated with the Delta III Total Shoulder Replacement (TSR) Prosthesis. This is a prospective outcome study involving 10 patients mean age (71.5 yrs). All patients failed conservative treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Mean time from injury to surgery was 10.5 (+/− 11.5) months. All patients underwent a Delta III TSR via McKenzie approach by a single surgeon. Patients were assessed clinically with Constant scores, asked whether they were satisfied, and radiologically with plain film radiographs. Since last review one patient has died. Mean time at follow up was 20.8 months post-operation (12 “32 months). Three patients had undergone early revision for dislocation. Since last review two patients have developed deep infection, one treated with washout and suction drain, one with removal of prosthesis. One patient has a clinical diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome. Three patients are very happy with the outcome of surgery, one is happy, one unhappy and four very unhappy. The mean pre-operative Constant scores was 8.9 (2–15), at first review 44.4 (15–96) and now 35.8 (4–76). The mean pain score on a visual analogue scale (0–10) was 3.6 (0–10). Radiographs showed no progressive notching of the glenoid in any patient. Mean flexion was 93 degrees (10,170), mean abduction 61 degrees (10,100) and mean external rotation was “1 degrees (−20,20). This is a new technique for treating proximal humeral fracture sequelae. Some individual results are excellent. There has been a high complication rate and a significant rate of poor results. At this time we cannot recommend the reverse geometry prosthesis for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture sequelae.
Patients were assessed with constant and age adjusted Constant scores, radiographs and subjective questionnaire and whether they were satisfied at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 months.
Various clinical outcome studies have consistently reported high dissatisfaction rate (25–33%) among the patients after hallux valgus surgery. We believe that a patient’s pre-operative expectations may play a major role in post-operative satisfaction.
Questionnaires were sent to 104 patients anonymously who were given a list of reasons and asked which they hoped to improve by having the surgery. They were also asked to list, in the order of priority, goals that they hoped to achieve from surgery.
Overall, improvement in the ability to walk was the most important reason. Most patients also wished to reduce pain over bunion and to regain the ability to wear daily shoes. However, the expectations of patients vary significantly according to age. Patients under 40 placed more importance on their ability to wear dress shoes and improvement in functional activities. Patients between the age of 40 and 60 were more interested to improve physical appearance. Pain on other toes, and the abilities to squat and climb stairs are the main concerns for patients above 60. For the male patients, to be able to continue work is the second most important reason after improvement in walking ability. This is in contrast to the female group where the ability to wear shoes of their choice is more important. Occupation did not make any significant difference.
This study shows that patients have different expectations that can influence the choice of operation. We believe that understanding patients preoperative expectation is crucial in achieving better patient satisfaction, and it should be an important consideration in planning appropriate operation for the patients.
Data collected on total knee replacements (TKR) from 77 hospitals in England were analysed to identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI). Demographic, operative, and infection data were collected prospectively over a four-year period by the Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Scheme. There were 213 (1.8%) infections reported in 11552 primary TKR of which 82% were superficial, 10% deep incisional, and 8% joint/bone infections. The incidence of SSI in 687 revision of TKRs was 4.1% (71% superficial incisional, 18% deep incisional and 11% joint/bone). In the single variable analysis of primary TKRs, significant risk factors were male sex (p<
0.01), age (p<
0.001), ASA score (p<
0.001), wound class (p<
0.001) and NNIS risk index (p<
0.001). In revision of TKRs, only age (p<
0.01) and pre-operative hospital stay of more than one day (p<
0.02) were found to be significant. Significant risk factors with multi-variable logistic regression were type of procedure (TKR or revision TKR), hospital where the procedure was performed, male sex, and age. The mean length of stay in primary TKRs was 10 days (19 days with SSI) and 12 days in revision TKR (22 days with SSI). The median time to diagnosis for superficial SSI was 7 days for superficial SSIs, 9 days for deep incisional SSIs and 7.5 days for joint/bone infections. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 35% of the infections and nearly one third of these were methicillin resistant (MRSA). There is significant inter-hospital variation in the incidence of SSI following total knee replacement. Revision TKR procedures are associated with a significantly higher incidence of SSI than primary TKRs (p<
0.001). Male sex and age are also important risk factors. Patients with SSI had a length of post-operative stay approximately twice that of those without SSI.