header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 263 - 263
1 Jul 2011
Lefaivre K Starr AJ Barker BP Overturf SJ Reinert CM
Full Access

Purpose: To describe operative experience and reductions of pelvic ring fractures treated with a novel pelvic reduction frame.

Method: All patients with displaced pelvic ring disruptions treated with the pelvic reduction frame were included. The series includes 35 patients, with 34 acute fractures and one malunion. Pre-operative and immediate post-operative radiographs were reviewed, and maximal displacement measured using two reproducible methods. Procedure and injury data were also recorded.

Results: In our series of 35 patients, we had 19 vertical shear fractures and 16 compression injuries. Mean age was 33.5 + 2.4, and mean delay to surgery was 4.7 + 0.6 days. Mean operative time in isolated procedures was 103.4 + 6.5 minutes. All but one patient had iliosacral screws placed, 18 had anterior column screws, six had symphysis plates and 12 had anterior external fixators. Maximum horizontal or vertical displacement was improved from 30.8 + 2.7 mm to 7.1 + 0.7 mm. Diameter asymmetry as measured on the AP view was improved form 26.4 + 2.7 mm to 5.2 + 0.7 mm. Very good, good or fair reduction was obtained in all acute cases. There was no statistically significant impact of obesity, fracture type or delay to surgery on quality of reduction (p> 0.05).

Conclusion: This novel pelvic reduction frame is a powerful tool in the effective reduction and fixation of displaced acute pelvic ring disruptions.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 256 - 256
1 Jul 2011
Gary J Lefaivre K Gerold F Hay M Reinert CM Starr AJ
Full Access

Purpose: Acetabular fractures in elderly patients are difficult problems with various treatment options. Our institution treats many of these patients with percutaneous acetabular fixation. We reviewed medical records and contacted patients to determine the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Method: Our institutional trauma database was searched for all patients age 60 and older who had been treated with percutaneous screw fixation for an acetabular fracture. Seventy-nine consecutive patients (80 fractures) were identified. Medical records were examined to obtain peri-operative and follow-up information regarding the hospital course and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. A survivorship anaylsis was created with conversion to total hip arthroplasty as the censored event, and standard Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed. Five categorical variables were used to test for differences in survival of the native hip: age, sex, simple versus complex fracture pattern, closed versus limited open reduction, and occurrence of a medical complication.

Results: Seventy-five fractures had adequate clinical follow-up with a mean of 3.9 years (range 0.5 – 11.9 years). Average blood loss was 69 cc and there were no postoperative infections. 19/75 (25%) were converted to total hip arthroplasty at a mean time of 1.4 years after the index procedure. Survivorship analysis demonstrated a cumulative survival of 65% at 11.9 years of follow-up. There were no conversions to arthroplasty beyond 4.7 post-operatively. There were no statistically significant associations between conversion to arthroplasty and age, sex, closed versus limited open reduction, simple versus complex fracture pattern, and occurrence of a medical complication.

Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation is a viable treatment option for patients age 60 or greater with acetabular fractures. Rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty are comparable to other treatment methods and if conversion is required, soft tissues are preserved for future surgery.