Background

Outcomes for patients with acute illnesses may be affected by the day of the week they present to hospital. Policy makers state this ‘weekend effect’ to be the main reason for pursuing a change in consultant weekend working patterns. However, it is uncertain whether such a phenomenon exists for elective orthopaedic surgery. This study investigated whether a ‘weekend effect’ contributed to adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacements.

Outcomes for patients with acute illnesses may be affected by the day of the week they present to hospital. Policy makers state this ‘weekend effect’ to be the main reason for pursuing a change in consultant weekend working patterns. However, it is uncertain whether such a phenomenon exists for elective orthopaedic surgery.

This study investigated whether a ‘weekend effect’ contributed to adverse outcomes in patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacements.

Retrospectively collected data was obtained from our institutions electronic patient records. Using univariate analysis, we examined potential risk factors including; Age, Sex, ASA Grade, Comorbidities, as well as the day of the week, hospital admission and surgery occurred. Subsequent multivariate analyses identified covariate- adjusted risk factors, associated with prolonged hospital stays. 30-day mortality data was assessed according to the day of the week surgery was performed.

892 patients underwent arthroplasty surgery from 01/09/2014 till the 31/08/2015. 457 patients had a total hip and 435 had a total knee replacement. 814 patients (91.3%) underwent surgery during the week, while 78 (8.7%) had surgery on a Saturday. There was no difference in the average Length of Stay (LOS) between groups (5.0, 2.6 versus 5.0, 3.4, p=0.95), and weekend surgery was not associated with a LOS greater than 4 days. The two variables found to be associated with a prolonged LOS were; increasing age (RR) 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01–1.03, p<0.001) and an ASA score of 2, (RR) 1.6 (95% CI: 1.15 − 2.20, p=0.005). There was one death in a patient who was ASA III, and who underwent surgery on a Monday.

There is no ‘weekend effect’ for elective orthopaedic surgery. Changes in consultant weekend working patterns are unlikely to have any effect on mortality or LOS for elective orthopaedic patients.

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the outcome of patients with metastatic spinal disease who underwent minimally invasive fixation of the spine for intractable pain or spinal instability.

This is a prospective audit of patients with metastatic spinal cord disease who have undergone minimally invasive fixation of the spine from August 2009 until the present date. This was assessed by pre and post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ5D and Tokuhashi scores. Intra- and post-operative complications, time to theatre, length of inpatient stay, analgesia requirements, mobility, chest drain requirement and post-operative HDU and ITU stays were also recorded.

So far, 10 patients have met the criteria. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operatively, there were no complications, chest drains, increase in analgesia or stay on the HDU or ITU. All patients showed an improvement in mobility. The mean post-operative day of mobilisation was 2 days, post-operative days until discharge 5.3 days and length of inpatient stay was shorter than traditional surgery. Blood loss was minimum except one patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who needed transfusion intraoperatively.

ODI, VAS and EQ-5D scores were calculated and were significantly improved compared to preoperatively.

This novel approach to management of metastatic spinal disease has resulted in improved mobility, short inpatient stays without the need for chest drains, HDU or ITU and an improved the quality of life in pallliative patients. This is a completely new strategy to treat the pain in these patients without the usual associated risks of surgery and has major advantages over traditional surgical techniques which may preclude this group of patients having any surgical stabilisation procedure at all

Patients who sustain hip fractures should be operated on within 24 hours of admission according to the Royal College Of Physician Guidelines. A delay to theatre of more than 4 days is associated with an increase in inpatient mortality. A high proportion of patients with hip fractures are elderly and take aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin.

A retrospective review of 100 patients admitted between December 2006 and July 2007 with a hip fracture was conducted. Our aims were to assess the proportion of patients taking antithrombotic medication, when the antithrombotic medication was stopped pre-operatively and see whether there was a delay to theatre. We also evaluated any association between patients taking antithrombotic medication and a return to theatre, post-operative morbidity and mortality and length of inpatient stay.

47 patients were taking aspirin, 1 was taking clopidogrel, 2 were on aspirin and clopidogrel and 3 patients were taking warfarin. The aspirin group had an increased delay to theatre compared to the no antithrombotic group, however, both groups had similar numbers operated on within 24 hours. 68% (32/47) patients had the aspirin stopped on the same day as the operation. 1 patient taking aspirin returned to theatre for evacuation of a haematoma. The main post-operative complication was pneumonia (n=9). 8 patients required a blood transfusion of which 5 were taking aspirin. The main causes of mortality were ischaemic heart disease (n=7) and pneumonia (n=5). The mean lengths of inpatient stay were 22.48 days in the aspirin group, 50 days in the aspirin and clopidogrel group, 66 days in the clopidogrel group, 24.33 in the warfarin group and 24.81 days in the no antithrombotic group.

It is suggested from this small study that there is no advantage in stopping aspirin prior to hip fracture surgery. However, further studies need to be undertaken.

There has been concern over the safety of the upright position for shoulder surgery from anaesthetists uncomfortable with the risk of reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF). Because there are no studies documenting what happens to CBF during upright surgery we aimed to measure CBF through an indirect and non-invasive method using recently available Ultrasound monitoring equipment.

This study randomised patients into awake (interscalene block alone) and GA with block, and indirectly measured the CBF by using a validated Doppler technique on carotid flow both before and during the shoulder procedure. Non-invasive and invasive measurements of mean arterial pressure were made throughout the procedure, together with doppler measurement of carotid flow following preoperative measurement of carotid contribution to cerebral flow in the radiology department by an experienced sonographer. All measurements recorded in real time and charted independently.

This study has shown that CBF in both groups were consistent with the expected values, and CBF remained proportionate in supine to upright. CBF values in the block alone group were generally lower than the GA group. In the GA group the MAP dropped lower, requiring use of adrenergic drugs to bring the pressure up. Despite the significant drop in MAP, the CBF was still high. This could signify cerebral autoregulation is a significant factor in the upright position.

We have shown the feasibility of use of DOppler to indirectly measure CBF during upright surgery. Despite the predicted drop in MAP in this position with GA, we could NOT show a concurrent drop in CBF, demonstrating that much more complex factors regulate the CBF in these patients. Clearly, monitoring is the key to safe administration of anaesthetic in the upright position.