header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 56 - 56
1 Mar 2021
Malik S Hart D Parashin S McRae S Peeler J MacDonald P
Full Access

Abstract

Objectives

ACL graft-suture fixation can be constructed with needle or needleless techniques. Needleless techniques have advantages of decreased injury, preparation time and cost. The Nice Knot (NK) is common among upper extremity procedures; however, its efficacy in ACL reconstruction relative to other needleless methods is not well known. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts prepared with the NK versus the modified Prusik Knot (PK).

Methods

Twenty QT grafts were harvested from 10 embalmed human cadaver specimens. 10 were prepared with the PK and 10 with the NK using a No.2 FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL). The prepared grafts were then mounted in a materials testing machine (ElectroPuls E10000, Instron, Norwood, MA) and subjected to tensile loading based on an established protocol. Each tendon-suture specimen was preconditioned with 3 cycles of 0–100N at 1Hz followed by a constant load of 50N for 1 minute and cyclic loading of 200 cycles from 50–200N at 1Hz and then loaded to failure at a displacement rate of 20mm/min. Load and displacement data for each tendon-suture construct was recorded by the testing machine.


Abstract

Objectives

Initial performance of sutured quadriceps tendon (QT) ACL graft constructs is not well studied in human tissue and the results of animal tissue testing may not extend to the human model. Two common methods of preserving human tissue are to freeze the specimens immediately after death or embalm with formalin solution. The purpose of this study is to compare elongations and loads in biomechanical testing of fresh-frozen to that of embalmed quadriceps tendon-suture constructs.

Methods

Twenty QT grafts were harvested from human cadaver specimens, 10 fresh-frozen and 10 embalmed. The grafts were prepared with the modified Prusik knot using a No.2 FiberWire (Arthrex, Naples, FL), mounted in a materials testing machine (ElectroPuls E10000, Instron, Norwood, MA) and subjected to tensile loading based on an established protocol. Each tendon was preconditioned with 3 cycles of 0–100N at 1Hz followed by a constant load of 50N for 1 minute and 200 cycles from 50–200N at 1Hz and then loaded to failure at a displacement rate of 20mm/min. Load and displacement data for each tendon-suture construct was recorded.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 579 - 579
1 Nov 2011
Peeler J Leiter J MacDonald PB
Full Access

Purpose: This research project compared the accuracy of 3 methods of meniscal injury diagnosis that are commonly employed in a clinical orthopaedics: Clinical examination, MRI and Arthroscopic surgery.

Method: A retrospective review of charting was used to collect meniscal injury assessment data for 116 patients that had sustained an acute anterior cruciate ligament injury to one knee. Sixty-eight of the 116 patients had the presence of a meniscal lesion confirmed via surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of “hands on” clinical examination and MRI interpretation were determined using the results of arthroscopic surgery as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of “hands on” clinical examination relative to MRI interpretation was also calculated. Finally, the findings of all three methods of meniscal evaluation were compared.

Results: Accuracy testing demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of clinical examinations (0.54 / 0.81) was comparable to levels observed for MRI (0.69 / 0.70), and when directly comparing the findings of clinical examination against MRI, that there was a high level of agreement when a meniscal lesion was not present (specificity: 0.91), but a much lower level of agreement when a meniscal lesion was suspected (sensitivity: 0.54). In general, when comparing the findings from clinical examination, MRI, and arthroscopic surgery, complete agreement among all 3 methods of evaluation occurred in only 51% of the patients.

Conclusion: Our results serve to highlight the inaccuracies associated with meniscal injury assessment when evaluating an acutely traumatized knee joint, and suggest that the incidence of secondary joint trauma following ligament injury may be under predicted.