Purpose: Few opportunities exist for physicians to easily obtain immediate insights or solicit direct advice from a respected peer on a complicated case. As a result, physicians end up relying heavily on journals, textbooks, and other dated resources that may prove to be dated or inadequate in addressing unique patient problems. Furthermore, the typical training modules available are limited to a one- or two-day experience. Often times this situation does not provide an adequate understanding of the surgical indications, techniques, and potential complications in the application of new technology. Consequently, many surgeons fail to adopt new technologies due to their lack of understanding of the application of such novel technologies. Recently, Reynolds et al studied the effect of peer collaboration among surgeons at a weekly surgery conference. They found that changes in surgical decision-making occurred in 12.5% of all cases reviewed and in 20% of the complex cases. However, collaboration should not be limited to weekly meetings or annual conferences. The Internet has introduced Collaborative Knowledge Networks (CKNs) that allow communities of surgeons to collaborate virtually on complex patient cases—allowing for rapid, bidirectional information. SpineConnect has surfaced as an example of a CKN that allows orthopedic spine surgeons to discuss surgical decisions.
Method: We studied the use of Internet collaboration among spine surgeons using the SpineConnect website. We also compared the improvement in the adoption rate of novel technologies using technology fellowships versus traditional training modules. These fellowships use both in-person and virtual collaboration through the Spine-Connect platform as a new means of training physicians.
Results: Using the SpineConnect website, surgical decision-making and planning was altered in 34% of active users and 90% agreed that the ability to collaborate with their peers, using a dedicated website, has improved their ability to practice spinal surgery. Continuous communication and dialogue resulting from the technology training fellowships encouraged better understanding of surgical indications, a greater comprehension of surgical technique, and a mechanism to discuss and solve complications. When such fellowships were implemented, we found a 30% improvement in adoption rate over traditional training modules.
Conclusion: The treatment of spine surgery patients has benefited from the utilization of collaborative platforms such as SpineConnect. In spine surgeon training and education, we found that CKNs promoted better surgical decision-making and increased understanding of new technology application.
