Purpose of the study: Restrained implants with intrinsic stability guaranteed by a large central stem have been developed for revision knee arthroplasty, irrespective of the underlying cause. Successful restraint implies excellent fixation of the prosthetic implants which can be obtained using press-fit centromedullary stems. The purpose of this work was to assess the long-term results of this mode of fixation in this indication and to search for clinical correlations with potential radiological images around the stems.

Material and methods: We report 46 cases of Sigma^®PFC TC3 revision total knee prostheses reviewed retrospectively at two years with a mean follow-up of eight years. Mean age at surgery was 68 years. Revision was indicated for aseptic loosening (n=24) and septic loosening (n=22). The knee society criteria were used for the clinical evaluation. Radiographic measurements were made semiautomatically with the Imagika^® software.

Results: The mean clinical score improved from 42 points preoperatively to 84.7 at two years and 83.7 at last follow-up. Outcome was excellent (n=30), good (n=7), fair (n=1) and poor (n=1). The mean function score improved from 34.3 preoperatively to 69.1 at two years and 64.2 at last follow-up. Radiographic alignment was correct in all cases. The press-fit effect was observed for 63% of the femoral implants and 76% for the tibial implants. Around the stems, 57% of the implants exhibited condensation lines and 23% lucent lines measuring less than 2 mm. There was no relation between radiological findings and the clinical or functional scores. There were two failures, one for frontal instability at six years and the other for aseptic loosening at eight years. Excepting these two cases, there was one case of femoral implant migration with no clinical expression. For all other patients, the radiographic image remained unchanged between the two year check-up and the final follow-up.

Discussion: Thee presence of lucent lines or condensation lines is well known for this type of implant with long centromedullary stems. Nevertheless, this is the first clinical series evaluating the clinical impact of these radiographic images. In our opinion, these images are related to the relative mobility of these implants which should be checked regularly, although no long-term clinical expression occurs. For us, this type of implant enables good function and long-term stability.

Purpose of the study: Osteosynthesis procedures proposed for fractures of the proximal humerus have evolved greatly since the development of anterograde nailing systems with the objective of providing a conservative surgical solution for sometimes complex fractures. We analyzed retrospectively the results obtained in a consecutive series of 30 patients treated in our unit with a Telegraph® nail.

Material and methods: Between March 2001 and August 2003, 39 patients presenting fractures of the proximal humerus were treated with a Telegraph® nail. Accorrding to the Duparc classification, the fractures were: 17, 11 ST+T, 4 CT II, and 7 CT III. Five patients died before the review presented here. Four CT III fractures presented material disassembly early and required revision with a hemiarthroplasty. For the 30 patients reviewed here, we noted the Constant score and the results of the Matsen test as well as radiographic findings.

Results: Mean follow-up for the 30 patients was 16 months (range 6–33). Mean age at trauma was 58.7 years (range 19–91). The mean Constant score was 57.4 (range 16–84) with 72% after weighting. The Matsen test was positive for 59%. Subjectively, 69% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. There were several complications: secondary intraoperative shaft fracture treated orthopedically, four nonunions of the surgical neck, four tuberosity migrations, three cases of head necrosis, two subacromial impingements (one with rotator cuff tear). Nonunion was generally observed with static locking and in one case with an oversized nail. We were unable to identify any factor predictive of head necrosis due to the small number of cephalotuberosity fractures. Disassembly was generally observed in patients with an initially displaced fracture with periosteal rupture, osteoporosis and old age.

Discussion and conclusion: Our results are less satisfactory than others published in the literature for series using this material and it is difficult to compare with results for series using other types of material because the study criteria were highly variable. Although all fractures in this series, including the most complex, appear to benefit from this nailing system, we did note that complications were not exceptional even though certain compliations observed were related to our learning curve. Surgeons should be aware that the planned option can be changed intraoperatively. Arthroplasty may be necessary in certain cases if the conditions are not adequate for stable osteosynthesis.