Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Feb 2014
Zehra U Noel-Barker N Marshall J Adams M Dolan P
Full Access

Introduction

Disc degeneration is often scored using macroscopic and microscopic scoring systems. Although reproducible, these scores may not accurately reflect declining function in a degenerated disc. Accordingly, we compared macroscopic and microscopic degeneration scores with measurements of disc function.

Methods

Thirteen cadaveric motion segments (62–93 yrs) were compressed to 1kN while a pressure-transducer was pulled across the mid-sagittal diameter of the disc. Resulting stress profiles indicated intradiscal pressure (IDP), and maximum stress in the anterior (MaxStress_Ant) and posterior (MaxStress_Post) annulus. Macroscopic grade (1–4) of disc degeneration was based on visual examination of mid-sagittal sections, using subscales that yielded a maximum score of 48. Microscopic grade (1–4) was based on histological sections of the disc + vertebral body taken from anterior annulus, nucleus pulposus and posterior annulus, using subscale scores that totalled 108. Cartilage endplate thickness (CEP_thickness) was measured histologically, and porosity of the bony endplates was measured using micro-CT. ANOVA was used to compare between grades, and regression was used to establish dependence on scores.