This study aimed to verify the accuracy of the DIERS Formetric Scan when assessing vertebral rotation of the apical vertebrae in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (A.I.S) patients, to determine whether the DIERS Formetric Scans can be used instead of or alongside radiographs when assessing A.I.S patients.

Both the radiographs and the DIERS Formetric Scans of 60 Preoperative A.I.S patients. All patients included in our study had predominant thoracic curves using the Lenke classification method, Cobb angle range 33° – 85°. Each radiograph was categorised into groups according to the severity of Nash-Moe rotation score of the apical vertebrae. Three groups were formed Nash-Moe +1 (20 patients), Nash-Moe +2 (27 patients), Nash-Moe +3 (13 patients). Each result was then compared to the maximal rotation analysed by the DIERS Formetric Scan, which took place on the same day as the radiographs. The results were then assessed using a Pearson Correlation Coefficient and a One-Way ANOVA with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD Analysis.

The Nash-Moe +1 Group scored a mean maximal rotation of 14.65° ±6.56 (11.82 – 17.48) (95% Confidence Interval), Nash-Moe +2 mean maximal rotation was 19.6° ±7.1 (16.92 – 22.28) and Nash-Moe +3 scored 21.53° ±8.9 (16.99 – 26.37). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient of this assessment was +0.342 (p value 0.07) demonstrating a weak positive correlation. The One-Way ANOVA analysis with Post-Hoc Tukey HSD analysis. The results of this analysis was an F value score of +4.115 (p Value 0.021) for the overall One-Way ANOVA test. The Post-Hoc Tukey HSD tests demonstrate that there is a statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 3 (p value 0.030) but there is no statistical difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p value 0.068) as well as no statistical difference between Group 2 and Group 3 (p value 0.716).

DIERS Formetric Scan assessment of vertebral rotation shows a positive correlation with the Nash-Moe method. This allows us to rely on the Formetric scans and thus a possible reduction in radiographs when assessing A.I.S, this reduces the exposure to ionising radiation in A.I.S patients.

Aim:

To Determine The Effect Of Posterior Instrumented Fusion On Lung Function In Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis Aged 8–11.

Background: Surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is done mainly for cosmesis and outcomes are reported in terms of radiological measurements (Cobb angle), outcome questionnaires (SRS-22) and back surface measurements (Scoliometer & Quantec). Previous studies have shown correlations between SRS-22 and objective radiological and back surface measures at a point in time (Asher et al 2003 & 2004).

Aim: of the study was to evaluate the association between subjective and objective outcomes in posterior instrumented scoliosis correction.

Patients and Methods: 43 patients with late-onset thoracic idiopathic scoliosis were included in the study with 39 girls and 4 boys with a mean age 13.2 years. Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 71o. The objective assessment of back surface was done using a scoliometer and the POTSI & Suzuki Hump Sum scores. The subjective assessment was done using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 score. The assessments were done pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 8-weeks and one year.

Results: The average percentage improvement in various outcomes after surgery was as follows: Cobb angle (71%), Maximum Angle of Trunk Inclination (Max. ATI) (52 % at 8 weeks and 39 % at 1 year), POTSI (57%), Hump Sum (24%), SRS-Total (14%), SRS-self image (14%). Pre-operatively, there were good inter-correlations (r= 0.4–0.7) between the objective measures (Max. ATI, POTSI and Hump Sum). Significant correlation was found between SRS-22 total versus Cobb angle (p-0.001, r=0.41). No significant correlation was found between the SRS-22 (total & domains) versus the Max. ATI, POTSI or the Hump Sum scores. Post-operatively, good correlation (r=0.6) was again found between the objective measures (Max. ATI, POTSI and Hump Sum) of back surface measurements (absolute and percentage). No significant correlation was found between SRS-22 (domains & total) versus Cobb angle correction, Max. ATI, POTSI, or Hump Sum.

Conclusion: In this study SRS-22 was found to be responsive to change with surgery, especially the self-image/appearance domain. However the SRS-22 score after surgery and the change in this score did not correlate with the change in objective measures of back surface deformity after surgery.