Background

A navigation system is useful tool to evaluate the intraoperative knee kinematics. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients often need to have TKA operation, however, there are few TKA kinematics studies comparing RA and Osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

Various types of tibial alignment guides exist, the results in performing the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are more or less than we desired. In addition, it is difficult to estimate the accuracy of tibial component alignment with radiograph because it is difficult to get true frontal and lateral view. In this study, we use new tibial alignment guide and estimate tibial component alignment by using postoperative CT scan.

30 knees underwent TKA using an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device (KneeAlign 2) and postoperative CT scans were obtained. Postoperative CT scans of the lower limbs analysed by 3D digital template system (Athena), demonstrated that 96.6% of the tibial components were placed within 90°± 2°to the mechanical axis in the coronal plane, and 96.6% of the components were placed within 3°± 2°to the mechanical axis in the sagittal plane.

As a result of this study, an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device can expect to decrease outliers in tibial component alignment.

Background

Septic knee arthritis is one of the most serious complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the effectiveness of its treatment affects the patient's quality of life. In our super-aging society, the frequency of TKA in the elderly, often combined with various comorbidities, is increasing. Careful management should be considerd during the management of septic arthritis after TKA in these patients.

Objectives

Biologic agents (BIO) drastically changed the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy from starting to use biologics at 2003 in Japan. The rate of orthopaedic surgery, especially total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may reflect trends in disease severity, management and health outcomes.

It is very important for implanting tibial component to prevent bearing dislocation in Oxford UKA. One of the keys is accurate rotational position of tibia. But the problem remains what is accurate rotation of tibia in UKA.

Oxford Signature decided the rotation of tibia component from MRI images. We measured the component rotation of tibia using CT after operation.

Introduction: It is difficult to measure the knee kinematics after TKA, navigation system can measure the knee kinematics during TKA operation. The purpose of this study is to describe the knee kinematic analysis in TKA using navigation system.

Patients and methods: TKA kinematics was measured in 24 patients (7 men and 17 women) 27 knees (7 rheumatoid arthritis knees and 20 osteoarthritis knees) in this study. Mean age was 72.8 (55–81). The TKA implant was Vanguard PS (Biomet, Warsaw) and navigation system was Vector Vision Knee ver. 1.6 (BrainLab Inc). All patients were operated using navigation system. This system was CT-based navigation system. We cut the bone independently and released medial collateral ligament, joint capsule and other tight structures to equal the joint balance. Femoral component was implanted parallel to clinical epicondylar line. Kinematic Analysis: We measured the joint gap (mm), coronal alignment (degree), antero-posterior translation (mm) and femoral rotation angle (degree) using navigation workstation just after all prostheses implantation and closure of joint capsule. The patient’s leg was held by operator and moved passively. All joint kinematic data were recorded at every 10 degrees in full range of motion (0 to 130 degrees). The joint gap is the distance between proximal tibial cut surface and that of distal femur (extension range: 0–40) and posterior femur (flexion range: 50–130). Medial and lateral distances were measured.

Results: In extension range, medial joint gap was 21.7mm at 0 degrees and decreased to 15.2mm with knee flexion. Lateral joint gap was 22.1mm at 0 knee extension, slightly decreased up to 40 degrees. Coronal alignment was 0.47 varus at 0 deg. and increased to 6.64 varus at 40 flexion. In flexion range, medial and lateral joint gap were increased 20.7 to 25.3, 17.2 to 31.2mm. Coronal alignment was c hanged from 4.94 valgus (60 flexion) to 8.94 varus (130 full flexion). Regarding to AP translation, femoral component was once moved 7.4 mm forward in early knee flexion and 15.2mm backward with flexion. Femoral components were rotated internally to 50 degrees flexion and then rotated externally with flexion.

Conclusion: The balance of TKA was still varus alignment after soft tissue release. Femoral components were moved backward and external rotation. Our results demonstrated that femoral rollback movement and medial pivot knee motion were recognized. The limitation of this study was the situation of under anesthesia and no muscle strain were loaded during the measurement of knee kinematics. However navigation system is available not only for the accurate implantation but also the measurement of intra operative knee kinematics.