Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 238 - 238
1 Sep 2005
Tokala D Mukerjee K Grevitt M
Full Access

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objectives: To determine whether apical vertebrectomy for correction of severe spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation significantly improves curve correction and to study complications of such a procedure.

Summary of Background data: Although a combined anterior-posterior procedure for correction of severe deformity in cerebral palsy patients is well established, apical vertebrectomy to improve correction has not been described.

Subjects: 5 patients (2M, 3F) operated on between 2000–2003 (anterior apical vertebrectomy followed by posterior instrumented fusion), mean age 14 years, average follow-up 1.5 years. All had group II (Lonstein & Akbarnia) rigid (mean 96degrees bending to 83degrees) thoracolumbar/lumbar curves with marked pelvic obliquity.

Results: Preoperative mean Cobb angle of 96 degrees corrected to 36 degrees, (63% correction, and 57% correction over and above the bending Cobb angle), 42 degrees at final follow-up. Mean apical vertebral translation (AVT) correction was 57 % (86mm to 37mm) and regional AVT correction 53%. Pelvic tilt correction was 72% (29degrees to 9degrees). Thoracic kyphosis remained unchanged but lumbar lordosis of 4.2 degrees (range−66 to +68) was corrected to 63 degrees. Mean blood loss was 1100mls (range 300–3000) for anterior surgery and 3400mls for posterior surgery. Operative time was 3 hours for anterior surgery. There were no intra-operative or post-operative complications (infection, pseudarthrosis, metalwork failure). Subjective outcome was excellent in all patients.

Conclusion: In patients with rigid, rotated curves with wide apical translation, apical vertebrectomy and posterior instrumented fusion can achieve significant correction of Cobb angle over and above the bending cobb angle and also the AVT and pelvic tilt leading to high parent / caregiver satisfaction and improvement in functional status of the patient.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 236 - 236
1 Sep 2005
Freeman B Mukerjee K Clarke A Webb J
Full Access

Study Design: Retrospective chart review.

Objective: To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of surgery for both dystrophic and non-dystrophic curves resulting from neurofibromatosis Type I.:

Subjects: 10 patients (7 females, 3 males) underwent surgical correction for neurofibromatous kypho-scoliosis between 1997–2003. The mean age at surgery was 16 years (range 8–37 years). Average follow-up 20 months (range 9 months – 4.5 years). Seven patients had MRI proven dystrophic curves (group I). These underwent 2–3 level apical vertebrectomy, followed by 2–3 weeks in Halo traction, followed by instrumented posterior spinal fusion and anterior rib strut grafting. Three patients had non-dystrophic curves (group II). Two underwent posterior instrumented fusion and one (aged 8 years) underwent convex epiphyseodesis with posterior Luque trolley.

Outcome Measures: Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, global apical vertebral translation (AVT), regional AVT, coronal and sagittal balance, complications and Modified SRS Outcomes Instrument completed at final follow.

Results: For the dystrophic curves the Cobb angle improved from a mean of 81.5 degrees (mean bending film to 76 degrees) to 26.6 degrees post-operatively (68% correction) and 35.8 degrees at final follow-up (56% correction) and the global AVT improved from 61.5 mm to 29 mm at final follow-up. The average score for the modified SRS outcome instrument was 91.6 (Good). For the non-dystrophic curves the Cobb angle improved from a mean of 57.5 degrees (mean bending film to 47 degrees) to 23.5 degrees post-operatively ( 60% correction) and 24.6 degrees at final follow-up (57% correction) and the global AVT improved from 56.8 mm to 27.8 mm at final follow-up. The average score for the modified SRS outcome instrument was 98.5 (Good). All complications occurred in the dystrophic group including superficial infection in 2, dural leaks in 3, temporary brachial plexus injury in 1, worsening of lower limb neurological deficit in 1 and one death (upper GI haemorrhage). There was no failure of metalwork or evidence of pseudarthrosis identified. Seven of eight patients stated that they would have the surgery done again.

Conclusions: Non-dystrophic curves maybe treated by posterior fusion alone achieving 60% Cobb correction and 55% AVT correction. Close observation should be maintained for the appearance of dystrophic features and deterioration of correction. Dystrophic curves should be treated early and aggressively by two/three stage apical vertebrectomy, grafting and posterior spinal fusion. In this series 68% coronal Cobb and 63% AVT correction was achieved post-operatively. Complications can be expected with scoliosis associated with more than 50 degrees of kyphosis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 236 - 236
1 Sep 2005
Tokala D Mukerjee K Grevitt M Freeman B Webb J
Full Access

Study Design: Retrospective chart review.

Summary of Background Data: Spinal osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis is performed to restore forward gaze and sagittal balance. Closing wedge lumbar osteotomy and polysegmental thoracic osteotomy in the same patient has not been reported.

Objective: To study the factors affecting correction of sagittal balance.

Subjects: 27 patients (23 male, 4 female) operated between 1989–2002: average age 46 years: minimum follow-up: 18 months. 19 patients had lumbar osteotomy alone, 6 had both lumbar and thoracic osteotomies and 2 had thoracic osteotomy alone. Three groups were identified: A) patients with decreased lumbar-lordosis and normal thoracic-kyphosis B) Normal / increased lumbar-lordosis and increased thoracic-kyphosis C) Decreased lumbar-lordosis and increased thoracic-kyphosis.

Results: Preoperatively, mean sagittal balance was +103 mm, thoracic-kyphosis 61 degrees, and lumbar-lordosis 25 degrees. Three months postoperatively, sagittal balance was +36 mm, thoracic-kyphosis 55 degrees, and lumbar-lordosis 49 degrees. At final follow-up sagittal balance was +44 mm, thoracic-kyphosis 57 degrees and lumbar-lordosis 46 degrees. In patients who had thoracic osteotomies, thoracic-kyphosis of 78 degrees was corrected to 48 degrees. There were no spinal cord injuries or permanent nerve root palsies. Six patients had deterioration of sagittal balance (SB) (> 45 mm), 5 of them required cervical osteotomy. There was significant association between post-operative thoracic-kyphosis of > 60 degrees and SB deterioration (p-value < .001, sensitivity 100%, specificity 75%). Statistically there was no significant association between SB deterioration and post-operative sagittal balance, lumbar-lordosis, osteotomy-angle and extent of fixation.

Conclusions: Correction of thoracic-kyphosis affected final sagittal balance significantly. Consideration should be given to the simultaneous performance of lumbar osteotomy and polysegmental thoracic osteotomies in selected patients to obtain greater correction and restoration of near normal sagittal balance.