Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to occur due to component malpositioning and/or oversizing, improper femoral component (FC) flexion and tibial component (TC) slope, tight extension gap, inaccurate joint line placement, deficient posterior osteophyte resection, heterotopic ossification (HO), poor patellofemoral joint reconstruction, poor posterior condylar offset restoration, and/or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) under-resection or retraction. However, the importance of these potential factors for stiffness are not well documented in the medical literature. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate specific radiographic parameters in patients who had stiffness after primary TKA. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients that were revised due to stiffness after TKA. We defined stiffness as 15º or more of flexion contraction, less than 75º of flexion or a range of motion (ROM) of 90º with the chief complaint of limited ROM and pain. Patients with history of previous revisions and/or ORIF, infection, or isolated polyethylene exchange were excluded. Patients with a minimum of 1 year radiographic follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements were performed as described by the Knee Society TKA Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES). Two blinded observers performed all measurements. Descriptive data is reported as mean (range). Inter-observer correlations were reported using Intraclass correlations coefficient (ICC).Introduction
Material and Methods
A stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an uncommon but disabling problem because it causes pain and limited function. Revision surgery has been reported as a satisfactory treatment option for stiffness with modest benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after TKA. We defined stiffness as 15 degrees or more of flexion contracture or less than 75º of flexion or a range of motion of 90º or less presenting with a chief complain of limited range of motion and pain. We evaluated the results of forty-two revisions performed by one of four orthopedic surgeons due to stiffness after TKA. Patients with history of infection or isolated polyethylene insert exchange were excluded.Introduction
Methods
Symptomatic instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a leading cause of early failure. Despite numerous reports on instability, standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols for these patients continue to remain unclear. Most reports recommend component revision as the preferred treatment, because of poor outcomes and high failure rates associated with isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange (ITPIE). However, modern implant systems and standardized protocols may potentially change this teaching. We performed an IRB-approved, retrospective review of 90 consecutive patients with minimum 2 years follow-up who underwent revision TKA for instability by one of four arthroplasty surgeons at a single institution. Mean age was 62.0 years (range, 41 to 83 years), and 73% of patients were women. Charts were reviewed for relevant preoperative clinical and physical exam findings, as well as pertinent intraoperative findings. Radiographs were analyzed for femoral and tibial component positioning. Pre- and post-operative Knee Society Scores (KSS) were calculated.Introduction
Methods
We performed physical examination and walking through a pedography plate (Emed, Novel Munich, Germany). We studied global plantar support (pressure, forces and areas) of each foot and also divided each foot into six parts. Data obtained was compared between group A, patients (healthy leg and ACL rupture leg) and group B (control group). Statistical analysis was performed with a non-parametric Wilcoxon test.
Group A midfoot pressure was higher in ACL rupture leg than in healthy leg (p<
0.007) and it was also higher to the one obtained for group B (p<
0.046). Evenly the anterior-external region of Group A, healthy leg got the highest pressure (p<
0.076), followed by Group A, ACL rupture leg (p<
0.022) and finally Group B. Group B anterior-internal pressure was statistically superior to Group A, ACL rupture leg (p<
0.049) followed by Group A, healthy leg (p=0.022). During foot takeoff, first toe pressures were higher in Group B compared to Group A (p<
0.076).
