Malalignment of total knee arthroplasty components may affect implant function and lead to decreased survival, regardless of preferred alignment philosophy – neural mechanical axis restoration or kinematic alignment. A common technique is to set coronal alignment prior to adjusting slope. If the guide is not maintained in a neutral position, adjustment of the slope may alter coronal alignment. Different implant systems recommend varying degrees of slope for ideal function of the implant, from 0–7°. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in coronal alignment with increasing posterior tibial slope comparing two methods of jig fixation. Prospective consecutive series of 100 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation. First cohort of 50 patients had extramedullary cutting jig secured distally with ankle clamp and proximally with one pin and a second cohort of 50 patients with the jig secured distally with ankle clamp and proximally with two pins. The change in coronal alignment was recorded with each degree of increasing posterior slope from 0–7° using computer navigation. Mean coronal alignment and change in coronal alignment was compared between the two cohorts.Introduction
Methods
The use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years. This is in part due to the proposed benefits of a faster early recovery and a lower risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study is to understand the dislocation rate in a non-selective, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing THA via the DAA including those at high risk for instability due to spinopelvic pathology. We performed a retrospective review of a large prospectively collected single institution database assessing all patients undergoing THA via the DAA between 2011 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was dislocation at minimum two-year follow-up. We then stratified patients by known risk factors for dislocation including spinopelvic pathology and performed an in-depth analysis of those patients who had a dislocation event.Background
Methods
Routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies have long been tenets of most TJA protocols. However, recent literature has called into question whether either is necessary with modern outpatient TJA clinical pathways. Demographic, cost, and readmission data for 2,605 primary unilateral TJA cases was collected retrospectively and analyzed prior to and after a protocol change where routine closed suction drains and postoperative laboratory tests were eliminated. This protocol change was designed to treat all primary TJA like outpatients regardless of their admission status. Drain usage changed from routine to selective based on hemostasis. Lab studies changed from routine to selective for patients on warfarin for VTE prophylaxis (INR), with ASA 4 or 5 status (BMP), and with a hematocrit < 27% in the recovery room after THA (CBC).Background
Methods
