Study Design: Retrospective study with clinical and radiological evaluation of 29 patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent 31 short segment anterior instrumented fusions of lateral hemivertebrae.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early surgical anterior instrumented fusion with partial preservation of the HV in the treatment of progressive congenital scoliosis in children below the age of 6.

Summary of background data: A variety of treatments have been described in the literature for the treatment of HV. We report the results of a novel technique.

Materials and Methods: Between 1996 and 2005, 29 consecutive patients with 31 lateral HV and progressive scoliosis underwent short segment anterior instrumentation and fusion with preservation of the HV. Mean age at surgery was 2.9 years. Mean follow-up period was 6.3 years.

Results: Preoperative segmental Cobb angle averaging 39°, was corrected to 150 after surgery, being 15º at the last follow up (60% of improvement). Compensatory cranial and caudal curves corrected by approximately 50% and did not change significantly on follow up. The angle of segmental kyphosis averaged 13º before surgery, 12º after surgery, and 12° at follow up. There was 2 wound infection requiring surgical debridment, 1 intraoperative fracture of the vertebral body and 1 case lost correction due to implant failure. All went on to stable bony union. There were no neurologic complications.

Conclusions: Early diagnosis and early and aggressive surgical treatment are mandatory for a successful treatment of congenital scoliosis and to prevent the development of secondary compensatory deformities. Anterior instrumentation is a safe and effective technique capable of transmitting a high amount of convex compression allowing short segment fusion which is of great importance in the growing spine

Introduction: The clinical effectiveness of spinal bracing for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is still not fully understood. Cohort studies on clinical effectiveness fail to adequately measure and control for confounding variables including spine flexibility, curve type, magnitude and maturity, distribution of corrective forces and compliance. This paper presents intermediate findings from a longitudinal study to objectively measure brace wear patterns and compliance in users of custom fitted TLSOs in the UK. Braces are fitted with data logging devices to measure temperature and humidity at the skin/brace interface. Previously reported measures of compliance have been in adolescents wearing Boston Braces using questionnaires, strap tension, interface pressure and skin temperature. They have shown compliance reported by the user can significantly over estimate actual compliance.

Methods and results: 20 patients are being studied over 18 months. TLSOs are fitted with data logging devices to measure temperature and humidity at the skin/brace interface. They are discrete sensors inserted into a pocket formed on the posterior of the brace. Measurements are recorded at 16 minute intervals and data downloaded every three to four months. Results clearly demonstrate compliance and daily wear routines. Temperature and humidity at the skin/brace interface during periods of wear are 35°C and > 80%RH respectively. Compliance ranges from 60–98%. Users who stick rigidly to their regime only remove their brace in the evening. Where poorer compliance is evident, the brace is worn sporadically during the day and evening, and worn full time at night.

Conclusion: Measurement of temperature and humidity at the skin/brace interface clearly demonstrates compliance and daily wear routines. Compliance varies from 60–98%. Where poor compliance is an issue it is intended to re-interview these individuals and obtain more detailed information about the reasons why they failed to use the brace.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the AO Universal Spine System (AO USS) with Harrington-Luque instrumentation for the treatment of King type II idiopathic scoliosis.

Methods/Results: A retrospective analysis was performed on two groups of patients with King II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The first group consisted of 40 consecutive patients treated with Harrington-Luque instrumentation between 1990 and 1993. The second group consisted of 25 consecutive patients treated with AO USS instrumentation between 1994 and 1996. The groups were well matched with respect to age, sex and curve severity. Inclusion criteria were patients over the age of 12 years with a King II curve pattern and a Cobb angle of greater than 40°. Half of the patients in each group underwent anterior release prior to posterior fusion. All patients were followed up six monthly for 18 months. The thoracic curve, lumbar curve, kyphosis and lordosis were measured using the Cobb method.

The mean pre-operative thoracic and lumbar curves were 62° and 43.9° respectively in the Harrington group and 57.5° and 35.9° in the AO USS group. On average 11.4 levels were fused in the Harrington group compared to 10.9 levels in the AO USS group. The mean post-operative correction of the thoracic curve in the AO USS group of 64% was significantly greater than the 51% achieved in the Harrington group (p< 0.005). At 18 months there was a 7% loss of correction in the Harrington group and 9% in the AO USS group. The correction of lumbar curve of 41% in the Harrington group and 46% in the AO USS group at 18 months was not significantly different. In the sagittal plane the AO USS group had significantly better preservation of the lumbar lordosis but there was no difference in kyphosis correction. Blood loss was similar in both groups. Mean operative time of 132 minutes in the AO USS group was shorter than the mean time of 153 minutes in the Harrington group (p< 0.05). Two hooks in the Harrington group became dislodged and two in the AO group. There were no neurological complications in either group. All the patients in both groups achieved a solid fusion.

Conclusion: AO USS is a safe and effective instrumentation system for the treatment of King type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction of the thoracic curve is superior to that achieved with Harrington-Luque instrumentation and operative time is shorter. AO USS enables better preservation of the lumbar lordosis than Harrington-Luque. There is no difference in blood loss, complication rate and fusion rates between the two techniques. It has become our instrumentation system of choice for this group of patients.

Fourteen patients with neurofibromatosis presented with symptoms or radiological evidence of cervical spine involvement over a period of 27 years. The symptoms included neurological deficit in five, neck mass in two, deformity in eight, decrease in neck movement in two and two with neck pain. Patients’ age ranged from five to forty-two years. Twelve patients have had surgical procedures. Two patients have been followed up and treated non-operatively despite osteolysis of vertebral bodies with kyphosis of more than 100°.

Current literature presents few cases of neurofibromatosis of the cervical spine. The largest World Series is of eight cases (Craig and Govender et al 1992). At present there is no coherent strategy of management for these conditions. The authors of this series recommend that correcting spinal deformity or to stabilise an unstable spine requires combined anterior and posterior fusion. Posterior fusion alone has a higher failure rate. Surgery for severe kyphotic deformity is questionable especially with no neurological deficit.