We present the first systematic review conducted by the UK Defence Medical Services in conjunction with the Cochrane Collaboration. Irrigation fluids are used to remove contamination during the surgical treatment of traumatic wounds in order to prevent infection. This review aims to determine whether there is evidence that one wound irrigation fluid is superior to another at reducing infection. A pre-published methodology was used and two reviewers independently assessed the search results. The search produced 917 studies, of which three met the inclusion criteria. All were studies in open fractures, incorporating a total of 2,903 patients. Each RCT involved a distinct comparison, precluding meta-analysis: i) sterile saline vs. distilled/boiled water; ii) antibiotic solution vs. soap solution; iii) saline vs. soap solution. The odds ratios of infection following irrigation with various fluids was as follows: i) saline vs. distilled or boiled water 0.25 (95%CI 0.08–0.73); ii) antibiotic solution vs. soap 1.42 (95%CI 0.82–2.46); iii) saline vs. soap solution 1.00 (95%CI 0.80–1.26). These results suggest that neither soap nor antibiotic solution is superior to saline and that saline is inferior to distilled or boiled water.

The TRISS methodology is used in by both the UK and US military trauma registries and relies on dividing casualties according to mechanism: penetrating or blunt. The UK and US military trauma registries use the original coefficients devised in 1987 and it is not clear how either registry analyses explosive casualties according to the TRISS methodology. This study aims to use the UK military trauma registry (JTTR) to calculate new TRISS coefficients for contemporary battlefield casualties injured by either gunshot or explosive mechanisms. The JTTR was searched for all UK Casualties injured or killed between 2003 and 2014. A logistic regression analysis was performed to devise new TRISS coefficients, these were then used to re-examine survival over the 12 years of the study. Comparing the predictions from the GSW TRISS model to the observed outcomes, it demonstrates a sensitivity of 98.1% and a specificity of 96.8% and an overall accuracy 97.8%. With respect to the explosive TRISS model, there is a sensitivity of 98.6%, a specificity of 97.4% and an overall accuracy of 98.4%. When this improved TRISS methodology was used to measure changes in survival, there was a sustained improvement over the 12-year study period.

The UK Military Trauma Registry was searched for all RN/RM personnel injured between March 2003 and April 2013. These records were then cross-referenced with the records of the Naval Service Medical Board of Survey which evaluates injured RN/RM personnel for medically discharge, continued service in a reduced capacity or return to full duty (RTD). Population at risk data was calculated from service records.

There were 277 casualties in the study period: 61 (22%) of these were fatalities; of the 216 survivors, 63 or 29% were medically discharged; 24 or 11% were placed in a reduced fitness category. A total of 129 individuals (46% of the total and 60% of survivors) returned to full duty. The greatest number of casualties was sustained in 2007; there was a 3% casualty risk per year of operational service between 2007–2013. The most common reason cited by the Naval Service medical board of survey for medical downgrading or discharge was injuries to the lower limb with upper limb trauma being the next most frequent injury.

This study characterises the injuries sustained by RN and RM personnel during recent conflicts and demonstrates significant challenge of predominantly orthopaedic injuries for reconstructive and rehabilitation services.

The aim of this study was to characterise injury patterns and examine whether survival had improved over the last decade of conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. A logistical regression model was applied to all UK casualty data from the Joint Theatre Trauma Registry.

There were 2785 casualties over the 10-years. 72% of casualties from hostile action were injured by blast weapons. The extremities were the post commonly injured body region, being involved in 43% of all injuries sustained. The New Injury Severity Score that was observed to be associated with a 50% chance of survival rose every year from 38 in 2003 to 62 in 2012. The odds ratio of surviving with a Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) of 50% rose by 1.349 (95% CI = 1.265–1.442) per year. The actual TRISS value associated with a 50% chance of survival dropped every year from 35.3% in 2003 to 0.9 in 2010 and was un-calculable in 2011–12.

This study confirms that the last decade of conflict has been characterised by blast wounds and injuries involving the extremities. A consistent improvement in survival over the 10 years has been demonstrated, to the point that traditional metrics for measuring improvement in trauma care have been exhausted.

This study defines the patterns of perineal injury due to blast currently seen on operations. It refines our team-based surgical strategies of surgical resuscitation provides an evidence base for a perineal debridement - colonic diversion didactic on the Military Operational Surgical Training (MOST) course.

The Joint Theatre Trauma Registry (JTTR) held at RCDM was examined from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2010. Data abstracted included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), treatment, management, length of stay (LOS) and outcomes.

Of 4807 military trauma patients, 118 (2.5%) had a recorded perineal injury, 56 died (48% all IED). Pelvic fractures were identified in 63 (53%) of which 17 (27%) survived. Mortality rates were significantly different between the combined perineal & pelvic fracture group compared to pelvic fracture & perineal injuries alone (41% & 18% respectively, p = 0.0001). Mean ISS for all patients was 41.03. Those with a pelvic fracture had a significantly higher ISS than those with perineal injuries alone (29.53 vs. 51.06, p = 0.0001). Recorded early antibiotic use was significantly more frequent in survivors (p = 0.0119). A literature review demonstrated the benefits of early feeding, emergent diversion, antibiotics, daily washouts and radical early debridement.

Combined perineal injuries & pelvic fractures have the highest rate of mortality. Early aggressive management is essential to survival in this cohort. Our recommendations are immediate faecal diversion, aggressive initial debridement & early enteral feeding (in the deployed ITU after first surgery). These findings will enable the rapid provision of an evidence based training schedule to be incorporated into our pre-deployment surgical training program (MOST) to improve surgical team preparation and patient outcomes.

Crown copyright 2009. Published with the (permission of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory on behalf of the Controller of HMSO

Aim To develop a militarily relevant complex extremity wounding model. Study Design Controlled laboratory study with New Zealand White Rabbits. Method Phase One: Injury Development. Under general anaesthesia, the flexor carpi ulnaris of the right forelimb was exposed and high energy, short duration impact delivered via drop test rig. Anaesthesia was maintained for three hours, the animal was recovered and saline soaked gauze and supportive bandaging applied. 48 hrs later, the animal was culled and muscle harvested for histological analysis. Analgesia was administered daily, animals checked by experienced staff at least twice daily and temperatures recorded by subcutaneous transponder. Phase Two: Contamination. Sequential groups of animals had inoculums of 1×102, 1×106 and 1×108/100μl of Staphylococcus aureus administered to the muscle immediately after injury. Animals were recovered as phase one. At 48 hours, animals were culled, muscle harvested and axillary lymph nodes sampled. Quantitative microbiological analysis was performed on the muscle. Results: Six animals given a loading of 0.5kg yielded consistent injury with 20% of the muscle becoming necrotic. Representative of injury from ballistic trauma, this was adopted as standard. Twenty-two subsequent animals were exposed to the injury and inoculated with the challenge doses. 1×106/100μl S.aureus provided the greatest consistency in recovered yield. There were no adverse effects on animal welfare and body temperatures were always within normal limits. Discussion. This model enables a consistent, contaminated soft tissue injury to be delivered in vivo. It will allow the investigation of complex wound management including wound coverage and fracture fixation.

Current ATLS protocols dictate that spinal precautions should be in place when a casualty has sustained trauma from a significant mechanism of injury likely to damage the cervical spine. In hostile environments, the application of these precautions can place pre-hospital medical teams at considerable personal risk. It may also prevent or delay the identification of airway problems. In today’s global threat from terrorism, this hostile environment is no longer restricted to conflict zones. The aim of this study was to ascertain the incidence of cervical spine injury following penetrating ballistic neck trauma in order to evaluate the need for pre-hospital cervical immobilisation in these casualties.

We retrospectively reviewed hospital charts and autopsy reports of British military casualties of combat, from Iraq and Afghanistan presenting with a penetrating neck injury during the last 5.5 years. For each patient, the mechanism of injury, neurological state on admission, medical and surgical intervention and cause of death was recorded.

During the study period, 90 casualties sustained a penetrating neck injury. The mechanism of injury was by explosion in 66 (73%) and from gunshot wounds in 24 (27%). Cervical spine injuries (either cervical spine fracture or cervical spinal cord injury) were present in 20 of the 90 (22%) casualties, but only 6 (7%) actually survived to reach hospital. Four subsequently died from injuries within 72 hours. Only 1 (1.8%) of the 56 survivors to reach a surgical facility sustained an unstable cervical spine injury that required surgical stabilisation, however this patient died as result of a co-existing head injury.

Penetrating ballistic trauma to the neck is associated with a high mortality rate. Our data suggests that it is very unlikely that penetrating ballistic trauma to the neck will result in an unstable cervical spine in survivors. In a hazardous environment (e.g. shooting incidents or terrorist bombings), the risk/benefit ratio of mandatory spinal immobilisation is unfavourable and may place medical teams at prolonged risk. In addition cervical collars may hide potential life threatening conditions.