The Covid-19 pandemic restricted access to elective arthroplasty theatres. Consequently, there was a staggering rise in waiting times for patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concomitantly, rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDOA) incidence also increased.

Two cohorts of patients were reviewed: patients undergoing primary THA, pre-pandemic (December 2017-December 2018) and patients with RDOA (ascertained by dual consultant review of pre-operative radiographs) undergoing THA after the pandemic started (March 2020 – March 2022). There were 236 primary THA cases in the pre-pandemic cohort. Out of the 632 primary THA cases post-pandemic, 186 cases (29%) had RDOA. Within this RDOA cohort, the pre-operative mean OHS, EQ5D3L and EQVAS (12.7, 10.5 and 57.6 respectively) were all poorer than in the pre-pandemic population (18.3, 9.4 and 66.7 respectively) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the RDOA and pre-pandemic cohort in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) at 12 months, perhaps due to their ceiling effect.

Within the RDOA cohort, 7 cases required acetabular augments, 1 of which also required femoral shortening. The rate of intra-operative fracture, dislocation, infection, return to theatre, and revision were 2.2%, 2.7%, 4.3%, 3.8% and 2.2% respectively, greater than those reported in the literature. No fractures nor dislocations occurred in robot assisted arthroplasties.

With ever increasing waiting lists, RDOA prevalence will continue to rise. Increased surgical challenges and potential use of additional implants generated by its presence excludes these patients from waiting list initiative pathways, potentiating the complexity of the operative procedure. Going forwards, the economic burden and training implications must be considered.

ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) programs have been widely adopted in elective orthopaedic practice. Early discontinuation of Intravenous (IV) fluids in order to promote mobilisation and subsequent discharge is a key feature of such programs. However concerns have been raised regarding whether such an approach results in an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

We set out to determine the incidence of AKI in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty treated as part of an ERAS program where IV fluids are removed before leaving the recovery room. Investigate whether there is a difference in incidence between patients with a pre-operative eGFR ≥ 60 or < 60 (ml/min/1.73m2). In addition to whether patients who sustain an AKI have a longer post-operative hospital stay.

The pre and post-operative blood results of patients undergoing elective total hip and total knee replacements were retrospectively analysed to determine whether they had suffered an AKI during admission. The patient's notes were reviewed for other known causes of peri-operative AKI and the length of their hospital stay.

The overall Incidence of AKI was 9.4%. There was a significant association found between pre-operative eGFR and development of an AKI p = 0.002. The incidence of AKI was 5.8% in patients with a pre-operative eGFR ≥ 60 vs 33.3% in those with an eGFR < 60. The development of an AKI was associated with a longer hospital stay p = 0.042. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days for those who suffered an AKI vs 5 days for those who did not.

Patients undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty with a pre-operative eGFR < 60 treated as part of an ERAS program where fluids are discontinued before leaving the recovery room are at high risk of developing an AKI. Further studies are required to ascertain whether a longer duration of IV fluids is effective in reducing the incidence of AKI in this group.

Current Department of Health guidelines state that medical personnel should be ‘bare below the elbows’. Critics of this policy have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients and their relatives on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by orthopaedic doctors. The secondary aim was to establish how patients would prefer orthopaedic doctors to be dressed.

The study consisted of the administration of a survey questionnaire to 427 subjects attending the orthopaedic outpatient clinics in four hospitals across Scotland. Subjects were asked about the importance or otherwise of various aspects of the doctors’ appearance and responded using a modified Likert 5-point scale. Subjects’ rank preferences for four different styles of doctors’ clothing were also determined. The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05.

The majority of respondents felt doctors’ appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the ‘bare below the elbows’ dress code policy. Indeed, the smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background.

Intro

Distal radial fractures are a commonly encountered fracture & anatomical reduction is the standard. Dorsal angulation is the traditional method of assessment but is inaccurate in rotated lateral xrays. Previously a relationship has been demonstrated between the dorsal cortex (DC) of the radius & the superior pole of the lunate (SL) & its sensitivity for assessing dorsal angulation & translation.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) validation of a novel method of assessing Distal Radial Fracture (DRF) reduction using the hypothesised constant relationship between the dorsal radial cortex (DC) and the superior pole of the lunate (SL).

MRI scans of 28 normal wrists were examined. Scans included the distal third of the radius to the proximal carpal row. Beginning 5cm proximal to the distal radius articular surface, a line was superimposed upon the DC extending distally through the metaphyseal flare.

Lunate height (LH) and distance from the DC line to the SL (DC-SL) were measured at 5-degree rotational increments around the radial shaft central axis to a total of 30 degrees of supination and pronation (S+P). The DC-SL/LH ratio was compared to 0 degrees (anatomical lateral) using the two-tailed paired student t-test.

There was no significant difference in DC-SL:LH between 0 degrees of rotation and any 5-degree increment up to 30 degrees of S+P (lowest p=0.075). The DC line lay consistently dorsal to the SL.

A constant DC-SL relationship exists with up to 30 degrees of S+P. This reference can be quickly and accurately used to assess DRF reduction in poorly-taken films with malrotation up to 30 degrees from anatomical lateral. Research comparing DC-SL distance with volar tilt to assess DRF reduction is needed.