Biomechanical alignment of the knee is a major determinant in the outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty. However, the best method to assess the alignment is yet undecided. Conventional methods use hip to ankle “long” standing x-rays but these suffer from technical difficulties and hence are a potential for error. Short x-rays are considered to have doubtful accuracy. This study aimed to assess if the “short” AP x-rays could be used to assess the lower limb axis within a range of statistically insignificant and clinically acceptable difference. The results indicate the readings from the short x-rays were not statistically different from those obtained from the long x-rays in four sets of observations. The largest difference between any two readings was 0.68 degrees. The analysis of data showed that the measurements from the short x-rays could indeed be used to assess the long axis of the lower limb with the provison that there is no gross femoral shaft deformity.
To report and validate the early migration rates of the collarless polished tapered hip replacement using manual and computer measurements To report early clinical results of the CPT hip
There was no significant difference between inter or intra observer measurements for hip migration. This is the first study to date that we are aware of that describes the subsidence rates of the CPT hip which includes validation by inter and intra observer readings.
Radiographs are often used to determine the varus/ valgus alignment of the prosthesis in relation to the long axis of femur. This is usually considered to be one of the important parameters in predicting early mechanical failure of the total hip replacement. The measurements made by the University of Dundee X-Ray Analysis Software and skilled manual operators of the varus and valgus angulations of hip prosthesis in relation to the femoral shaft were compared for inter and intra-observer reliability. The manual measurements were carried out on the same randomly selected digitised images of 78 postoperative X-rays by two independent observers and by the same analysis software twice. The results of the study showed a very high agreement between the readings of the two methods (the largest difference was 0.6 degrees) and two observers (the largest difference being 0.08 degrees) indicating excellent intra and inter observer reliability. The lowest correlation was 0.82 and this was between software reading 1 of observer 1 and software reading 1 of observer 2. The highest correlation of 0.99 was between software reading 1 and software reading 2 for the same observer. The software analysed the x-rays with precision and accuracy and was much faster than manual measurement. A further benefit of the computerised method is an unskilled operator can be trained in 15 minutes to use the software
Osteoporosis has been implicated as one of the causative factors for Colles’ fracture. The current study was designed to establish whether the degree of osteoporosis has any influence on the radiological severity of Colles’ fracture in active elderly peri-menopausal female patients. Female peri-menopausal patients who sustained a Colles’ fracture were studied. The ultra distal Bone Mineral Density (uBMD) was determined using DXA in the contralateral non-fractured wrists, which were also x-rayed. Anthropometric measurements were recorded, the radiological severity of the fracture was assessed using a computerised image analysis system, which measured the radial angle, height and width on AP view and the dorsal tilt on lateral view. Measurements were carried out on the fractured and the normal wrist. Pearson’s correlations between age, height, weight, BMI, uBMD and fracture measurements were carried out. The Bone Deformity Index (BDI) was defined as the summation of all the differences of the previous parameters between the normal and fractured wrists on the AP view. ANOVA, with bonferroni correction, was used to compare the parameters and the radiological measurements between normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic patients. Sixty-seven patients were recruited. Those with Barton fractures, previous fractures of the wrist or a previous history of chronic treatment with bone modifying drugs were excluded. Forty eight patients were analysed. The parameters measured had a tendency to be worse with increasing degree of osteoporosis, although the only significance was in the measurement of dorsal tilt on the lateral view (p = 0.05). The normal patients were significantly heavier (89.3 kg) than the other two groups (p =0.03). In the osteoporotic group the correlation between uBMD and the BDI was −0.6, between uBMD and radial height difference was –0.5 and between uBMD and the angle difference in AP was also –0.5. Similar correlations in normal patients were not statistically significant. Power estimates were performed. Because of the relatively large variability within the samples, a sample size of 550 cases will be necessary to reach a power of 80% to detect a pre-defined clinically significant difference of 3 units in the BDI between groups. The evidence from this study suggests that the initial radiological deformity in osteoporotic patients was greater in those patients with severe degree of osteoporosis. The deformity in normal patients did not have a correlation with the uBMD but these patients were significantly heavier, indicating a different combination of causative factors in these two groups. The precision of the current method of x-ray measurements has enabled a precise definition of the variability within the different groups, resulting in the production of information that was not previously available.