Hallux valgus is a common condition often leading to significant symptoms. However, its correction has recently been suggested, to be a procedure of limited clinical value. Scarf osteotomy is one of the most commonly performed operations for hallux valgus correction. Although technically demanding, it is powerful in its capacity to correct the hallux valgus deformity and sufficiently robust with internal fixation to allow early weight bearing.

We prospectively collected data for consecutive scarf osteotomies between 2008 and 2011. Preoperative and 6 week postoperative assessment was made using radiographic measurements HVA (hallux-valgus angle) and IMA (inter metatarsal angle). We evaluated 130 scarf osteotomies. The mean HVA improved from 29.5 pre-operatively to 12.6 post correction. The mean IMA improved from 12.4 pre-operatively to 8.1 post correction. The AOFAS hallux scores improved from an average of 55 pre op to 79 post operation.

The results suggest that hallux valgus correction does have clinical value and that scarf osteotomy is a reproducible procedure, with a generally good to excellent results in the short term.

Large studies have reported high dislocation rates (7 to 24%) following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly when the revision is undertaken in the presence of pre-existing instability. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcome of 155 consecutive revision THA's that had been performed using an unconstrained dual-mobility acetabular implant. It features a mobile polyethylene liner articulating with both the prosthesis head and a metal acetabular cup, such that the liner acts as the femoral head in extreme positions. It can be implanted in either a press fit or cemented manner. Mean follow-up was 40 months (18–66) and average age 77 (42–89). Uncemented (n=122) and cemented (n=33) implants with a reinforcing cage, were used. Indications were aseptic loosening (n=113), recurrent instability (n=29), periprosthetic fracture (n=11) and sepsis (n=2). Three of the 155 cases (1.9%) dislocated within 6 weeks of surgery and were successfully managed with closed reduction. The 3 dislocations occurred in the groups revised for recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. There were no cases of recurrent dislocation and no revisions for implant failure. Despite a pantheon of options available, post-operative dislocation remains a challenge especially in patients with risk factors for instability. The use of large diameter heads is proven to improve stability but there are concerns regarding wear rates, metal toxicity and recurrent dislocation in the presence of abductor dysfunction. With constrained liners there are concerns regarding device failure and aseptic loosening due to implant overload. Our dislocation rates of 1.9% and survivorship to date compare favourably with alternative techniques and are also in line with studies from France using implants of a similar design. In our hands, where there are risk factors for dislocation, the use of a dual-mobility implant has been very effective at both restoring and maintaining stability in patients undergoing revision THA.