Department of Epidemiology, ASL RM/E, Rome, Italy School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK Faculty of Health, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, UK Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, “Tzanio” General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan Thriasio General Hospital, Athens, Greece To evaluate the efficacy of bracing in adolescent patients with AIS. Cochrane systematic review The following databases were searched with no language limitations: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and reference lists of articles. Extensive hand searching of grey literature was also conducted. RCT's and prospective cohort studies comparing braces with no treatment, other treatment, surgery, and different types of braces were included. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Two studies were included. There was very low quality evidence from one prospective cohort study including 286 girls1indicating that braces curbed curve progression, at the end of growth, (success rate 74%), better than observation, (34%) and electrical stimulation (33%). Another low quality evidence from one RCT with 43 girls indicated that a rigid brace is more successful than an elastic one (SpineCor) at limiting curve progression when measured in Cobb degrees2. No significant differences between the two groups in the subjective perception of daily difficulties associated with brace wearing were found. There is very low quality evidence in favour of using braces, making generalization very difficult. The results from future studies may differ from these results. In the meantime, patients' choices should be informed by multidisciplinary discussion. Future research should focus on short and long-term patient-centred outcomes as well as measures such as Cobb angles. RCTs and prospective cohort studies should follow both the SRS and the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) criteria for bracing studies.
Side shift exercise was originally described by Mehta. Since 1986, we adopted it for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Outcome of the side shift exercise for the patients with idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity was evaluated retrospectively. Fifty-three patients with idiopathic scoliosis whose curve was greater than 20 degrees by the Cobb’s method were included in the study. All the patients were treated only by the side shift exercise and their treatment was started after skeletal maturity. Skeletal maturity was diagnosed by Risser’s method as either grade IV or grade V. The study comprised five men and forty-eight women. Twenty-six patients had thoracic curve, eight had thoracolumbar curve, and nineteen had double major curve. Patients were instructed to shift their trunk to the concavity of the curve repetitively while they were standing and to maintain the side shift position while they were sitting. In double major curve, larger curve was the subject of the treatment. The average age at the beginning of the treatment was 16.3 years (range, 13 to 27 years), and the average age at final follow-up was 19.8 years (range, 14 to 33 years). The average follow-up period was 3.5 years (range, one to 11 years). The average Cobb angle at the beginning of the treatment was 33.3 degrees (range, 20 to 74 degrees), and the average Cobb angle at final follow-up was 32.2 degrees (range, 10 to 73 degrees). Curves of four patients decreased 10 degrees or more. Most of long term follow-up studies reported that untreated idiopathic scoliosis progressed even after skeletal maturity. Although the follow-up period was much shorter, results of the present study suggested that the side shift exercise was a useful treatment option for the management of idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity.
