header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 105 - 105
1 Feb 2017
Bhowmik-Stoker M Martinez N Bluemke V Elmallah R Mont M Dunbar M
Full Access

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a routine, cost-effective treatment for end-stage arthritis. While the evidence for good-to-excellent patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical data is present, approximately 20% of patients continue to be dissatisfied with results of their surgery. Dissatisfaction is strongly correlated with unmet patient expectations, and these patients may experience a higher cost of care due to recurring office and emergency visits. Therefore, this survey asked a large group of United States (U.S) and international surgeons to prioritize areas of opportunity in primary TKA. Specifically, we compared surgeon responses regarding: 1) the top 5 areas needing improvement; which were stratified by: 2) surgeons' years of experience; and 3) surgical case volume.

Methods

A total of 418 orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed. Two hundred U.S. surgeons and 218 international surgeons participated from 7 different countries including: The United Kingdom (40), France (40), Germany (43), Italy (40), Spain (38), and Australia (17). To participate, surgeons had to be board certified, in practice for 2 years, spend 60% of their time in clinical practice, and perform a minimum of 25 joint arthroplasties per year. Surgeons were asked to choose the top 5 areas of improvement for TKA from a list of 17 attributes including clinical and functional outcomes, procedural workflow and economic variables. Surgeons were able to specify additional options if needed. Results were stratified by annual case volume (25 to 50; 51 to 100; greater than 100 cases) and years of experience (1 to 10; 11 to 20; greater than 20). Single-tail proportion tests were used to compare results between cohorts, where an alpha of 0.05 was set as significant.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 182 - 182
1 Sep 2012
Martinez Carranza N Nurmi-Sandh H Lagerstedt A Hultenby K Berg H Ryd L
Full Access

Single focal grade IV cartilage lesion in the knee has a poor healing capacity. Instead these lesions often progress to severe and generalized osteoarthritis that may result in total knee replacement. Current treatment modalities aim at biological repair and, although theoretically appealing, the newly formed tissue is at the best cartilage-like, often fibrous or fibrocartilaginous. This at the expense of sophisticated laboratory resources, delicate surgery and strict compliance from patients.

An alternative may be small implants of biomaterial inserted to replace the damaged cartilage. We investigated the response of the opposing tibia cartilage to a metallic implant inserted at different depth into the surrounding cartilage level.

Methods

The medial femoral condyle of both knees of 12 sheep, 70–90kg, 2 year of age and from the same breeder, was operated. A metallic implant with an articulating surface of 316L stainless steel, diameter of 7mm, HA plasma sprayed press-fit peg and a tailored radius and contour to the sheep femoral condyle was placed at the most weight-bearing position. The level of the implant was aimed flush, 0,3 and 0,8 mm below surrounding cartilage. The animals were stabled indoors, allowed to move freely and euthanized after 6 and 12 weeks. Postoperatively the knees were high resolution photographed for macroscopic evaluation. The position and depth of the implant were analysed using a laser scan device. Tibial and femoral condyles specimen were decalcified and slices were prepared for microscopic evaluation. Implant position and cartilage damage was assessed from two independent observers using a macroscopic ICRS score and a modified histologic score according to Mankin.

Results

22 tibia condyles showed a variety of cartilage damage ranging from severe damage down to subchondral bone to an almost pristine condition. There was a strong correlation between implant position and damage to opposing cartilage surface. Mankin score correlated significantly with implant position (p<0.001 regression analysis, r2=.45) as did the ICRS score (p<0.001, regression analysis, r2=.67). Implants sitting proud were associated with poor Mankin score. There was no difference between 6-week and 3-months knees.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 26 - 26
1 Mar 2006
Monteagudo M Martinez N Muñoz T Martos S Rodea M
Full Access

In order to regain preinjury activities following an Achilles tendon rupture while reducing the potential complications of open surgery and non-operative treatment, we developed a new protocol that involved the use of a modified local anaesthetic technique, percutaneous repair and early function.

We prospectively treated 32 patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures according to our protocol with a 12 month minimal follow-up. Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis and within 48 hours from rupture for all cases. Our local anaesthetic technique allowed us to have a comprehensive control over sural nerve location by the definition of a “safe area” (video will be shown) and has proved to be effective to avoid sural nerve damage during surgery. The 28 male and 4 female patients had a mean age of 35 years (range, 26 to 47 years). The percutaneous repair was performed with a #2 nonabsorbable monofilament. Patients began range-of-motion exercise at 48 hours, used a posterior splint for 2 weeks, and then began ambulation with crutches and a 2 cm heel wedge incorporated on sport shoes or alternatively country boots. At 5 weeks, the wedge shoe was discontinued, full weight-bearing was allowed, and progressive resistive exercises were initiated.

There were no reruptures, wound infections, sural nerve damage, recurrent pain, or skin necrosis in our group of patients. One patient (with an hemathological disorder) developed a deep venous thrombosis that resolved uneventfully.

Mean AOFAS score was 80 at 6 months and reached 98 at 12 months. High-demand patients (police officer, firemen, athletes, professional soccer player) returned to their activities by 5–6 months. Patients were very satisfied with the procedure and subjetive evaluation turned to be very good or excellent for all cases.

Achilles tendon management using our protocol is an efficacious method demonstrating a low morbidity rate together with a return to preinjury level by 6 months. In addition, this protocol is cost effective (saves on hospital admission, anaesthesia, complications) and athletes in our group were able to obtain their athletics goals with minimal or no deficits.