To assess the impact of the declaration of the state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of visits to a traumatology emergency department (ED), and on their severity. Retrospective observational study. All visits to a traumatology ED were recorded, except for consultations for genitourinary, ocular and abdominal trauma and other ailments that did not have a musculoskeletal aetiology. Visit data were collected from March 14 to April 13 2020, and were subsequently compared with the visits recorded during the same periods in the previous two years.Aims
Methods
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are self-renewing, multipotent cells that could potentially be used to repair injured cartilage in diseases. The objetive was to analyze different sources of human MSCs to find a suitable alternative source for the isolation of MSCs with high chondrogenic potential. Femoral bone marrow, adipose tissue from articular and subcutaneous locations (hip, knee, hand, ankle and elbow) were obtained from 35 patients who undewent different types of orthopedic surgery (21 women, mean age 69.83 ± 13.93 (range 38–91) years. Neoplasic and immunocompromised patients were refused. The Ethical Committee for Clinical Research of the Government of Aragón (CEICA) approved the study and all patients provided informed consent. Cells were conjugated wiith monoclonal antibodies. Cell fluorescence was evaluated by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and analysed using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson). Chondrogenic differentiation of human MSCs from the various tissues at P1 and P3 was induced in a 30-day micropellet culture [Pittenger et al., 1999]. To evaluate the differentiation of cartilaginous pellet cultures, samples were fixed embedded in paraffin and cut into 5- υm-thick slices. The slices were treated with hematoxylin-eosin and safranin O (Sigma-Aldrich). Each sample was graded according to the Bern Histological Grading Scale [Grogan et al., 2006], which is a visual scale that incorporates three parameters indicative of cartilage quality: uniform and dark staining with safranin O, cell density or extent of matrix produced and cellular morphology (overall score 0–9). Stained sections were evaluated and graded by two different researchers under a BX41 dual viewer microscope or a Nikon TE2000-E inverted microscope with the NIS-Elements software. Statistics were calculated using bivariate analysis. Pearson's χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the Bern Scores of various tissues. To evaluate the cell proliferation, surface marker expression and tissue type results, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used, depending on the data distribution. Results were considered to be significant when p was < 0.05. MSCs from all tissues analysed had a fibroblastic morphology, but their rates of proliferation varied. Subcutaneous fat derived MSCs proliferated faster than bone marrow. MSCs from Hoffa fat, hip and knee subcutaneous proliferated slower than MSCs from elbow, ankle and hand subcutaneous. Flow cytometry: most of cells lacked expression of CD31, CD34, CD36, CD117 (c-kit), CD133/1 and HLA-DR. At same time 95% of cells expressed CD13, CD44, CD59, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD151 y CD166. Fenotype showed no differences in cells from different anatomic places. Cells from hip and knee subcutaneous showed a worst differentiation to hyaline cartilage. Hoffa fat cells showed high capacity in transforming to hyaline cartilage. Cells from different anatomic places show different chondrogenic potential that has to be considered to choose the cells source.
Human cells: CD13+ (94–99%), CD44+ (87–99), CD49d (14–70%), CD90+ (92–99%), CD105+ (90–97%), CD 117-BD+ (2–22%). Sheep cells presented CD13+ (32–70%), CD34-, CD36, CD44+ (90–96%), CD49d (40–80%), CD54+ (50–80%), CD90+ (90–97%), CD105+ (10–25%). CD117-BD+ (48–76%). Rabbits cells: CD13+ (14–78%), CD44+ (10–80%), CD49d (2–9%), CD90+ (27–92%), CD105+ (2–24%), CD 117-BD+ (15–57%). Human cells number/mL did not show significant differences between patients, or between P0 0 (14 culture days) (average mean: 525000 ± 298956) and P5 (525000), nevertheless the average mean decreased from P5 to P6 (130.000) until P8 (111 culture days) (85.000). Rabbits cells number/mL did not show significant differences between P0 (673000 ± 379697) and P1 (596000 ± 488740) and decreased in P2 (299500 ± 159161) without any significant change in P8. Ovine cells number/mL average mean in P0 was 1.370.600 (± 802758), this decreased in P1 (420000 ± 95197) however, showed no significant changes in P8 (291875 ± 86394).
Dimensions of the 60 male human lumbar vertebrae were quantified on their digitalised lateral images, and related to them across the five vertebral levels (range of 20–40 years). Vertebra dimensions’ were defined and referred to the upper endplate. Linear dimensions (mm) were: the length of the whole vertebra and of the spinous process; the anterior/posterior body heights, and the upper/lower endplate lengths. For each of the measurements L3/L1, L3/l2, L3/L4, L3/L5 ratios were calculated. The inclination angle (°) of the lower-end-plate was further calculated. Significant differences were shown by a randomized complete blocks design, post-hoc test (Student-Newman-Keuls), (α<
.05). Anterior bodies’ heights ratios progressively decreased from L1 to L5 level, which means a relative increase of the anterior bodies’ heights. Posterior bodies’ heights ratios progressively increased from L1 to L5 level, which means a relative decrease of the posterior bodies’ heights. Lower-endplates inclination angle significantly and progressively increased from L1 to L5 vertebral level. For L1 and L2 (𝛉<
0°), it means that vertebrae are ventrally wedged, whereas L3, L4, L5 vertebrae are dorsally wedged (𝛉<
0°). It could be suggested that individual vertebra morphology contributes to shape the anterior convexity of the lumbar curvature along with the intervertebral discs. Spinous process and vertebral lengths ratios significantly decreased from L1 to L2, and significantly increased from L4 to L5, but no differences between L1vs. L5 neither for L2 vs. L4. It shows that lengths of the spinous process and vertebrae define two segments with same trends at the lumbar spine, the upper L1 and L2 segment; and the lower L4 and L5, which join together at L3 vertebra. This design allows to drawn the concavity of the lower back while standing upright and its convexity while flexing forward.