The incidence of wound complications after a hip or a knee replacement is well established, but there is no such data about foot/ankle surgery. Without this data it is difficult to compare performance between different care-providers. It is also difficult to benchmark services that could potentially be provided by a wide range of care providers (chiropodists, podiatrists, podiatric surgeons, general orthopaedic surgeons with a small foot/ankle practice, etc). Our aim was to establish the incidence of wound complications after foot/ankle surgery and provide a baseline for future comparison. Our study was done in two parts. First part was to conduct an opinion-survey of BOFAS members with a substantial foot/ankle practice, on wound complications from foot/ankle surgery in their own practice. Second part was to conduct a prospective study on the incidence of wound complications from our own foot/ankle practice. The study was registered as an audit and did not require ethical approval. All wound complications (skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, superficial and deep infections) were recorded prospectively. Record of such data was obtained by an independent observer, and from multiple sources, to avoid under-reporting. 60 % of the responders to our survey had a predominant foot/ankle practice (exclusive or at least 75 % of their practice was foot/ankle surgery) and were included for further analysis of their responses. A large majority of these responders (64%) reported a rate of 2–5 % for superficial infection, and a significant majority (86 %) reported a deep infection rate of less than 2 %. Results from our own practice showed an incidence of superficial infection of 2.8 % and deep infection of 1.5 %. With increasing focus on clinical outcome measures as an indicator of quality, it is imperative to publish data on wound complications/ infection after foot/ankle surgery, and in the absence of such data, our two-armed study (survey-opinion and prospective audit) provides a useful benchmark for future comparisons.
Thermal shrinkage of the shoulder capsule requires postoperative joint immobilisation with the humeral head centred in the glenoid fossa for optimal proprioceptive recovery. Routinely applied commercial slings hold the arm internally rotated and lengthen the posterior capsule. The aim of our study was to develop and test the clinical effectiveness of a splint that would maintain the shoulder in an optimal position of neutral rotation after posterior capsular shrinkage. To our knowledge, no splint has been described for this purpose. We developed a new design fabricating the splint using thermoplastic material. The design was then modified to ensure ease of fitting and patient comfort. The custom-made splint is fashioned preoperatively and fitted in the operating room after the dressings are applied. Our study group consisted of 18 cases of multidirectional or posterior shoulder instability who were splinted for a period of three weeks after thermal capsular shrinkage. The comfort and compliance of the splint were assessed using a patient questionnaire. Constant scores for the study group were retrospectively compared with a similar patient group managed with a ‘polysling’.
