header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 371 - 372
1 Mar 2004
Sanjeev P Azzopardy T Arthur A Mackay G
Full Access

Aims: To validate a set of simple clinical tests, these could then be used to establish an objective assessment of an individualñs ability to perform an emergency stop safely in orthopaedic clinics. Methods: This prospective ethically approved study involved assessment of emergency breaking reaction times of Right knee arthroscopy patients using a computer linked car simulator designed by Transport Research Laboratory (TRL). The ability to perform an emergency stop was assessed as the time taken to achieve a brake pressure of 200N after a visual stimulus. Each patient was tested preoperatively, 1 day and 1 week after arthroscopy. In addition three speciþcally designed clinical tests were performed, i.e, a) Knee ßexion during single leg stance; b) Active plantar ßexion against the weight of the whole body during single leg stance c) straight leg raise for 10 seconds. Results: In total 31 patients completed the study. The average reaction time preoperatively was 750ms; Correlation between driving reaction times and the results of clinical tests was performed. Statistical analysis revealed sensitivity up to 96%, speciþcity up to 71% and positive predictive value up to 92% for the clinical tests. Conclusions: Ç Doctor when I can drive? È is a common question faced by all orthopaedic surgeons in the clinics. As driving simulators are not available in the clinics it is appropriate for patients to be assessed with these simple clinical tests, to decide the actual timing of return to driving. A similar study involving joint replacement patients is underway.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 101 - 101
1 Feb 2003
Patil S Mackay G Taylor M Keene G Paterson R
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to determine if routine x-ray exposure produced any chemical oxidation of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE), used for joint arthroplasty.

Three different polyethylene polymers were obtained from Biomet, Depuys and Howmedica. These samples had undergone sterilisation and packaging methods. Rectangular shapes of polymer were cut according to the standards specified by the ASTM (American Society For Testing and Materials). Eight samples of each polymer were obtained and divided randomly in to test and control subgroups. The test samples were exposed to ten x-rays with the standard dose used for the hip joint.

Polyethylene oxidation was measured using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. This technique can assess the incorporation of oxygen within the carbonyl region. Radiated and non-irradiated samples were compared in each polymer group.

Oxidation from the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was quantified by calculating the area under a signature absorption peak for UHMWPE (methylene band at 1370 cm-1) and an oxidation absorption peak (carbonyl band at 1720 cm-1). The ratio of the area of the oxidation peak to the area of the signature peak yields the carbonyl content, or oxidation, relative to the amount of polyethylene. There was no significant difference in oxidation after exposure to x-rays between test and control UHMWPE samples.

Although numerous studies have looked in to the effects of high dose radiation exposure on polyethylene, effects of routine x-rays have not been studied before. It is common practice to follow-up patients with joint replacements over a long period with xrays at each visit. Present study examined the effects of routine x-rays on oxidation of polyethylene. However there was no detectable oxidation after exposure to x-rays. This study paves way for further research in this direction.