Purpose: The increasing number of ACL reconstructions has led to the introduction of new techniques irrespective of the fact optimal tunnel angle placement has yet to be established. Improper tunnel angle placement is associated with a variety of complications including graft failure. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the reliability of tibial tunnel angles produced by two experienced surgeons using a free hand method or mechanical guide (HowellTM 65° Tibial Guide).

Method: Tibial tunnel angles in the coronal and sagittal planes were determined from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, respectively, taken at 2 to 6 months postoperatively. Fifty-two sets of digital radiographs were analyzed (free hand = 28, mechanical = 24) with the knee in full extension 100 cm from the beam source. Tunnel angle measurements were calculated using NIH ImageJ software. Each angle was measured by two investigators on three separate occasions with minimum 7 days between each analysis.

Results: There was a significant difference (p< 0.05) in tibial tunnel angle placement between the mechanical guide (64.76 ± 5.88) and free hand (61.11 ± 5.04) group in the coronal plane. No significant difference in tibial tunnel placement in the sagittal plane was detected (mechanical guide =73.63 ± 7.69, free hand = 73.51 ± 6.68). Intra-rater and Inter-rater reliability for measurements in the sagittal (ICC = 0.809; 0.733) and coronal (ICC = 0.69; 0.812) plane ranged from high (> 0.75) to moderate (0.75–0.40), respectively.

Conclusion: Tibial tunnel angles in the coronal plane produced with a mechanical guide are more accurate than those drilled free hand when the intended angle of placement is 65°. The method used to measure tibial angles in this study was reliable within and between investigators. Further research will be conducted to investigate the correlation between tunnel angle placement and patient outcome measures.

The purpose of this study was to determine which activities are important to patients and to determine the severity of those problems. The five most important activities were walking outside, driving, walking indoors, stair climbing and daytime pain. Importance of these did not change postoperatively. The five most severe problems causing limitation were a limp, stiffness, loss of energy, daytime pain and locking. All these activities become statistically less severe over twenty-four months. Activities that are important to patients are different than the problems that are ranked by severity. Surgeons can educate patients that the severity of problems do improve over time following TKA.

The objectives of this study were:

to determine the five most important activities and five most severe problems for patients prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the Patient Specific Index (PASI) and

Activities that are most important to patients are different than problems that patients find severe. Important activities remain important over time. Severe problems become less severe over time.

Functional activities and PASI scores improve after TKA. Surgeons can educate patients that the problems they find most severe preoperatively do improve over time following TKA. Important activities remain important.

Patients scheduled for elective primary (or revision) TKA at two tertiary care teaching hospitals were enrolled in the study, excluding those not fluent in English and those undergoing TKA for a tumour, acute fracture, or an infection of the prosthesis. Patients completed the PASI pre-operatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months post-operatively.

One hundred and nineteen subjects were enrolled, nineteen were excluded. The five most important activities (ten- point scale, ten is most important) preoperatively were (mean; 95% CI): walking outside (6.25; 6.23–6.27), driving (6.17; 6.12–6.22), walking indoors (6.14; 6.12–6.16), climbing stairs (6.12; 6.10–6.14), and daytime pain (5.84; 5.81–5.87). These activities were not statistically less important over time. The most severe problems were limping (4.81; 4.77–4.85), stiffness (4.59; 4.56–4.62), lack of energy (4.51; 4.47–4.55), daytime pain (4.46; 4.43–3.39) and locking (4.38; 4.27–4.49). These were significantly less severe at twenty-four months (p < .001).