It appears that double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can reproduce the original anatomy of the ligament, restoring normal kinematics and rotational control of the tibia. But an anatomical single bundle reconstruction may present very similar results, with minor technical difficulties and lower costs.

We compared two groups of 25 patients each, that underwent ACL reconstruction by the same surgeon, with a follow-up of 12–36 months. One group had double bundle reconstruction with hamstring and the other had single bundle anatomical reconstruction with patellar tendon.

Patients underwent a subjective evaluation and clinical testing with instrumented laxity with Rolimeter, and the data entered in the IKDC 2000 scale Double tunnel hamstring Vs bone-tendon-bone: Functional outcome of 85.6% Global Class A and B vs. 82.1% Class A and B. The subjective outcome (IKDC 2000) was 90.93 vs. 91.47. Pivot-shift test with 87% patients in class A and class B at 9.7% Vs 75% patients in class A, 21.4% for class B. The Rolimeter gave an average Lachman value of 2,56 and anterior drawer test of 2,88 Vs average Lachman value of 3.59 and anterior drawer test of 2.92. One leg hop test showed 85.7% knees class A, 9.5% knees class B vs. 90.4% knees class A and, 2.8% knees class B.

The subjective score was slightly higher in the single bundle anatomical reconstruction with patellar tendon, despite the overall functional outcome being higher in the double tunnel technique with hamstrings. The average Lachmann in the patellar tendon group was 1 mm higher. The rotational stability in the double tunnel was higher.

The same surgeon had better results in the double tunnel hamstrings technique, despite less experienced with this technique, which is more demanding, probably reflecting objective advantages over the single bundle reconstruction with patellar tendon

The median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel is the most common compression syndrome of the upper limb. In most cases it is idiopathic but may also occur from anatomical, traumatic, endocrine, rheumatic or tumoral causes.

Chow's endoscopic technique was initially used to treat this disease and then modified to a mini-open approach through a single palmar incision. This incision is similar to the one used in endoscopic release by Agee. After exposing the proximal part of the transverse carpal ligament a meniscus knife is advanced until there is a complete section of the ligament, without endoscopic equipment.

Between 2004 and 2006, 200 hands in 179 patients with a diagnosis based on clinical and electromyographic criteria were operated by this mini-open technique. The mean follow-up was 49 months (minimum of 34 months and a maximum of 70 months).

50 randomly selected patients were submitted to the self-administered Boston questionnaire. 50 patients treated by the minimal-incision decompression during the same period were also given the questionnaire. The aesthetic satisfaction was registered as well as if they would have surgery on the other hand or would recommend the procedure.

This mini-open technique is another technique available to the surgeon that allows very similar functional results to endoscopic surgery, without use of specific material and with a shorter surgical time.

Primary synovial chondromatosis, defined by Jaffe (1951), is a rare, benign arthropathy, of unknown aetiology, distinguished by the chondroid metaplasia of the synovial membrane of the joint, bursa or tendon sheath, which leads to the formation of loose bodies, usually intra-articular. It is characteristically monoarticular and the knee, hip and elbow are the joints most commonly affected. The shoulder is a rare localisation and the extra-articular involvement even rarer, with only few cases presented in the literature.

The diagnosis is possibilited by the clinical examination and by the confirmation of the presence of multiple intra-articular loose bodies by roentgenographic studies and magnetic resonance (MR). The treatment is always surgical. Malignant degeneration of synovial chondromatosis into chondrosarcoma is described, although rare.

We report an exceptionally rare case of synovial osteochondromatosis of the shoulder with combined intra and extra-articular involvement in a 28 years old female patient, former athlete. She presented with a five-year history of shoulder pain and slight limitation of motion. Radiographic examination and magnetic resonance imaging led us to the diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder. The patient underwent arthroscopic removal of the intra-articular loose bodies and partial synovectomy. The subscapularis recess was then identified through an anterior deltopectoral incision and multiple loose bodies were removed from within.

Primary synovial chondromatosis of the shoulder is rare (5% of the cases) and the involvement of the extra-articular shoulder site is even rarer. Bloom and colleagues reported ten cases involving the shoulder in a meta-analysis of 191 synovial chondromatosis cases.

The arthroscopic removal of the loose bodies combined with the partial sinovectomy has demonstrated efficacy and low recurrence rates, allowing excellent visualization of the joint, decreased morbidity and early functional return. Nevertheless, we think that this approach may become insufficient when the extra-articular involvement is verified.