Objectives: The results of knee arthroplasty are commonly assessed by survival analysis using revision as the endpoint. We have used the assessment of pain by a patient based questionnaire as an alternative after the Oxford Phase 3 UKA implanted by a minimally invasive technique.

Materials and Methods: Between January 1999 and May 2007, 223 consecutive Oxford arthroplasties were implanted by a single surgeon in a county hospital. Mean followup period was 35 months. Patients were assessed prospectively pre-operatively and after UKA in each year subsequently by a questionnaire. Survival analysis was undertaken.

Results: Preoperatively 85.8% had moderate or severe pain. Postoperatively, of five patients(2.6%) with persisting pain due to failure of using proper patient selection three were revised to TKA and two are still being followed. Three patients(1.6%) with moderate pain after using proper indication criteria accepted their complaints. Ten other patients (5.2%) experiencing moderate pain some time during the eight year period were successfully treated by arthroscopy. If after surgery patients experienced pain which had spontaneous improved by the second year, the initial pain was ignored. Totally 9.6% of patients experienced moderate or severe pain at some stage, and the failure rate was 4.2% in this period of 8 years’ experience.

Conclusion: When strict indications are followed the failure rate of the procedure can be minimised till 1.6% when moderate pain is considered the endpoint. As relief of pain is the primary reason for joint replacement, this is likely to be the most important factor in determining the long-term outcome for the patient.

Introduction: The use of the Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee in elderly patients is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyse the performance of patients 75 years of age or older after surgery with the Oxford Phase 3 prosthesis by a minimally invasive technique.

Material and methods: Between January 1999 and September 2004, 128 Oxford Phase 3 prostheses were implanted by a single surgeon. Patients with a minimal follow up (FU) of one year were divided in two groups depending on age. (Group A less than 75 years, group B 75 years or more.) Loss to FU was documented. The pre and postoperative clinical outcome of the patient with the new implant was objectively evaluated by a visual analog pain and satisfaction score, the WOMAC Score, Oxford score, the Knee Society knee score and Knee Society function score. The range of motion (ROM) was documented.

Results: Fourty-five patients were under the age of 75 (group A). Thirty patients were 75 or older (group B). In the second group 4 patients were lost to FU: two deceased and two due to severe illness. Mean age (range) in the first and second group was 67 (47–74 yrs) and 79 (76–87) years respectively. Both groups had a mean FU time of 29 months. In the preoperative scores there was a significant difference in the WOMAC function score (49.7 A vs 42.4 B), Knee Society knee score (51.2 A vs 45.5 B) and the Knee Society function score (51.7 A vs 41.4 B).The pre-operative ROM was 120.1 (A) vs 122.7 (B) degrees. Comparing the postoperative scores a significant difference was found in the Knee Society knee score (89.1 A vs 78.0 B) and in the WOMAC function score (77.8 A vs 74.0 B). The Oxford score and the postoperative VAS for pain and satisfaction were slightly in favour for the younger group, but did not differ significantly. The postoperative ROM was 126 degrees in both groups.

Conclusions: This study shows that in both groups the scores are good to excellent but slightly in favour for the younger group of patients operated for anteromedial osteoarthritis using a minimally invasive approach. Patients’ satisfaction is high in both groups. The slight difference in scores may be due to the presence of comorbidity in the older patient. Although the follow up in this study is the shortterm we advocate the use of the Oxford Phase 3 prosthesis in the elderly patient. The minimally invasive technique will lead to better range of movement, a quicker recovery of the older patient with less risk of complications and will be in our opinion more cost-effective than total knee replacement.

Introduction: The introduction of the Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) by a minimally invasive technique has significantly changed the treatment of medial osteoarthritis of the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to analyse our early results and to evaluate the clinical importance of the learning curve of the procedure.

Material and methods: Patients who were operated between January 1999 and September 2003, were divided in two groups. Group A consists of 34 patients (35 prostheses) who were operated between January 1999 and December 2001 with a minimal follow-up (FU) time of 24 months. The second group (B) consists of 41 patients (44 prostheses) who had surgery between January 2002 and September 2003 with a FU of minimal 12 months. WOMAC score, Oxford score, Knee Society knee/function score, VAS for pain and satisfaction, radiographical alignment, operation time and complications were documented and compared between the two groups. A slight modification of the operation technique was applied in the second group.

Results: The Knee Society function score differed significantly in favour for group B (81.5 A vs 88.1 B; p< 0.05). The Knee Society knee score was: 86.7 (A) vs 89.7 (B). The postoperative VAS for pain and satisfaction were slightly in favour for the second group. The Oxford and WOMAC score did not differ significantly. The ROM was 125.1 (A) vs 126.7 (B) degrees. The operation time was 84 (A) vs 64 (B) minutes. The radiographical tibio-femoral alignment was 6.1 (A) vs 6.4 (B) valgus. Optimal radiographical positioning of the three components was 51% (18/35;A) vs 80 % (35/44;B). Two complications were encountered only in the first group: dislocation of the meniscal bearing component, and lesion of the lateral meniscus. There were three patients with moderate pain complaints in group A and two in B.

Conclusions: This study shows that when an appropriate surgical technique is mastered from the very beginning, good to excellent clinical results can be achieved even in the learning curve period. The positioning of the prosthesis, as confirmed by radiographical study, after using our own modification of the surgical technique was improved.

Introduction: Oxford Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now performed using a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique. Although early results are encouraging, the studies assessing outcome could be criticised for the restricted number of patients and centres involved. A multi-centre follow-up of patients is required to confirm the preliminary findings.

Aim: To examine early clinical outcome in patients with minimally invasive Oxford medial UKA using a multi-centre, multi-surgeon design.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out in three centres with involvement of six surgeons. All patients undergoing cemented Oxford UKA for medial OA using MIS were included. 231 consecutive UKAs with a minimum follow up of 2 years (mean: 2.84) were assessed using objective and functional Knee Society Score (KSS).

Results: There were 108 females and 102 males (21-bilateral) with average age of 66.8 years (42 – 86). No significant difference was noted between various age groups or between different surgeons. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for unexplained pain and one for bearing dislocation. Cumulative survival rate at 2 years was 98.6% with 93% patients having good or excellent KSS rating.

Conclusions: This multi-centre study has confirmed preliminary findings that Oxford UKA using a minimally invasive approach is safe and effective.

Introduction: The introduction of Oxford UKA byminimally invasive techniques has signiþcantly changed the treatment of anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee joint. It is therefore necessary to evaluate this treatment option both clinically and radiologically. Aims: To study the radiographic and clinical results of the Oxford medial UKA in patients with a minimum follow up of 2 years in a single centre. Methods: A prospective independent study in which 67 consecutive UKAs were implanted by a single surgeon, using a minimally invasive technique. All patients with a minimum follow up of 2 years were pre- and postoperatively clinically evaluated by the AKSS and radiologically according to the Oxford Centre criteria, including ßuoroscopy. Results: Clinical: 28 patients with 30 prostheses (mean FU: 2.54 yr; mean age: 71.4 yrs) were included. The Knee Score improved signiþcantly from 58.7 (pre-op) to 95.0 (FU). The Function Score improved from 54.5 to 88.8. Mean ROM was 125û preoperatively and 121û at FU.Radiological: preop: varus deformity (n=18; mean 3.4û; range 2–10û), and valgus (n=12; 5.4, 2–12û). Postop: valgus alignment in all (n=30; 6.3û, 4–12û). Fifteen cases (50%) showed signs of patellofemoral arthritis (PFA); 11 cases with grade 2–3 PFA had a maximum pain score of 50. Full congruency of the tibial and femoral components was obtained in 18 cases, 10 cases were within and 2 out of margin according to the Oxford Centre criteria. Radiolucency below the tibial component was seen in 2 cases. Conclusions: This independent study has conþrmed preliminary þndings that using a minimally invasive approach good radiological and clinical results can be obtained. Presence of PFA had no inßuence on good clinical outcome.