Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a proven for treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Survival rates have been found comparable with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in specialty hospitals series, but registry based studies show worse results of survival of UKA. High BMI, age of the patient, patellofemoral arthritis or learning curve have been found to have only mild consequences to the survival rates. Original indications for Oxford UKA in OA are severe pain and full thickness cartilage loss with bone-on-bone contact in the medial side. After widespread use of UKA surgeons are broadening their indications. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative degree of OA on survival rate of UKA.

Material and Methods: 113 knees in 103 patients were operated with Oxford phase 3 UKA. We evaluated all the patient data retrospectively and patient age, body mass index (BMI), sex, earlier arthroscopies, operation time, follow-up time, preoperative medial joint space widths, reoperations and survival of UKA was recorded

Results: The mean age of the patients was 58 years (38–81) and mean follow-up time was 47 months (3–114). 22 UKAs were revised and the overall survival rate was 80.5%. 68% of revised knees have had undergone arthroscopy before UKA to confirm existence of arthritis. Odds ratio for female gender was statistically non-significant 1.59 (95% CI 0.57–4.45, p=0.46,). For BMI and patient’s age, the association remained non-significant with odds ratios of 1.07 (95% CI 0.98–1.17, p=0.14) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90–1.02, p=0.19). Patients were divided four sub-groups according medial joint space width (medial joint space width ≤2 mm and > 2 mm) and Lateral/medial joint space width ratio (L/M-ratio ≤2.5 and > 2.5). Over 2 mm medial joint space width or L/M-ratio less than 2.5 were found significant risk factors for revisions, odds ratios being 6.00 (95% CI 2.12–17.00, p< 0.01) and 7.88 (95% CI 2.76–22.54, p< 0.01), respectively.

Discussion: Nowadays UKAs are performed on patients with mild OA against the original indications. In more severe OA varus alignment of the knee causes mechanical overload to the medial compartment, which is well corrected by UKA. Also it is possible that in the cases of prolonged knee pain caution is focused incorrectly to mild OA, which is typical radiological finding even in asymptomatic middle aged and elderly patients. Also in the early phase of OA it is impossible to estimate progression of cartilage damage in other two compartments. In conclusion we suggest that not to extend original indication of UKA and patient should have true medial bone-on-bone OA in preoperative radiographs. Performing UKA for patients with medial joint space width over 2 mm or L/M-ratio less than 2.5 should be concerned particularly careful.

Background: The aim of our prospective, randomized study was to compare two operative techniques for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture and question the necessity of augmented repair. Null hypothesis: Augmentation with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap does not give any better result than end-to-end suturation by the Krackow locking loop surgical technique.

Study Design: A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Sixty patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomized preoperatively to receive end-to-end suturation by the Krackow locking loop technique either without augmentation (Group I) or with one down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap, as described by Silfverskiöld (Group II). A dorsal brace allowed free active plantar flexion of the ankle postoperatively, whereas dorsiflexion was restricted to neutral for the first three weeks. Weight bearing was limited for six weeks. The follow-up period was one year, and evaluation was performed in terms of clinical measurements, an outcome score, isokinetic calf muscle performance tests and tendon elongation measurements.

Results: The mean operation time was 25 minutes longer in the augmentation group and the incision 7 cm longer (p< 0.001 both). The overall ankle scores were excellent in 70% of cases and good in 30% in both groups. The isokinetic calf muscle strength scores were excellent in 41% of cases, good in 52%, and fair in 7% in group I, whereas those in the group II were excellent in 45% of cases, good in 35%, fair in 15% and poor in 5%. Achilles tendon elongation occurred in both groups and elongation correlated significantly with previous AT problems (ρ= 0.47, p=0.040), isokinetic peak torque deficits (ρ= 0.64, p=0.001) and isometric strength deficits (ρ= 0.48, p=0.026) in the nonaugmentation group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups at the 3-month and 12-month check-ups with regard to pain, stiffness, subjective calf muscle weakness, footwear restrictions, range of ankle motion, overall outcome, iso-kinetic calf muscle strength, mean peak work-displacement relationships or tendon elongation. Six re-ruptures (three in each group) and two deep infections in group II were regarded as treatment failures and were excluded. The final results in all the rerupture cases were good.

Conclusions: Routine use of augmentation does not seem to be necessary in surgery for fresh total Achilles tendon ruptures.

Since the 1970s Swanson implant arthroplasty has become a treatment of choice in metacarpohalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty in destructed MCP joints of rheumatoid patients. Sutter (Avanta) implant is also composed of silicone but the centre of rotation is more anatomical, and volar to improve extension moment. Clinical results about these implants have been similar but fracture rates of Sutter implant have been reported to be high. Reason for osteolysis is inflammation reaction to silicone particles released from prostheses due to movement of prosthesis in bone or implant fractures. Reports about osteolysis around Swanson implants present variable result.

There is not grading of osteolysis in the literature before and we created a new radiographic grading for osteolysis around silicone MCP implants. Grading is based on involvement of cortical bone: Grade I: Osteolysis varying from a single clear line adjacent to the stem of the prosthesis to a larger, clear area which did not involve the bone cortex; Grade II: Osteolysis affecting the bone cortex to a maximum of one half of the thickness of the cortex; Grade III: Osteolysis affecting the cortex to more than one half of its thickness but not perforating the cortex; Grade IV: Osteolysis perforating the cortex.

In this study we compare the incidence of radiographic osteolysis following insertion of 89 Swanson and 126 Sutter MCP implants in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Before surgery hands were randomised one by one to Swanson and Sutter implant groups. The mean follow-up time in the two groups of patients was 57 (40–80) and 55 (36–79) months, respectively.

A total of 45 (60%) metacarpal and 40 (53%) proximal phalangeal bones showed no osteolytic changes in the Swanson group. In the Sutter group numbers were 20 (21%) and 26 (27%). In the Swanson group, there was less cortical osteolysis and there were 4 (5%) perforations of a metacarpal and no perforations of a proximal phalanx. In the Sutter group, there were 9 (9%) perforations in a metacarpal and 5 (5%) in a proximal phalanx. (p< 0.001). To create a single independent observation of osteolysis for a hand, the worst osteolysis of a metacarpal or proximal phalanx was recorded. There was only one (5%) perforation in the Swanson group, while there were 8 (30%) perforations in the Sutter group (p=0.011). In all grades of our classification, osteolysis was more frequent in the Sutter than in the Swanson group.

Aims: The aim of the present study was to compare the functional outcome between silastic Swanson and Sutter implants in metacarpophalangeal joints in a prospective and randomised of study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: The study was prospective and randomised. Thematerial comprised 53 patients (6 men, 47 women) and 58 hands; a total of 89 Swanson and 126 Sutter implants were installed. The mean follow-up time was 57 (40–80) and 55 (36–79) months, respectively. Results: Active extension was corrected similarly in both groups. In the Swanson group from median [inter-quartile rate (IQR)] 22° (8, 44) to 12° (0,20), and in the Sutter group from 19° (7, 37) to 16 (5, 25). The median active flexion decreased less in the Sutter group from 75° (69, 84) to 64° (53, 72) vs. Swanson from 83° (77, 90) to 58° (48, 64) during the follow-up, and with that respect the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p=0.01). Statistically significant difference (p=0.03) was detected in correction of ulnar deviation only in ring finger: in the Swanson group from median 25°(6°, 34°) ulnar deviation to 1°(2°radial, 9°) radial deviation and in the Sutter group from 14°(7°, 28°) to 5°(0°, 13∞) respectively. Conclusion: It appears that the Sutter implant yields at least as good functional results in the MCP replacement as the Swanson prosthesis.