Introduction: Prosthetic joint infections are a growing burden. Since we felt that we were far from the optimistic results recently published, we decided to find out the reality in our department. The goals were to determine:

The rate of infections in primary and revision surgery (hip and knee)

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all patients that underwent surgical treatment due to infected hip or knee prosthetic joint between 1st July 2001 and 31st December 2007.

Results: Since the majority of infections (67%) presented in the first two years after surgery, we determined the rate of infections taking in to consideration a minimum two years follow-up. We calculated a 1.8% (12/678) rate of infection for primary total hip and 3.3% (20/588) for primary total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Revision hip surgery had a 5.4% (15/243) infection rate and revision knee surgery revealed an even higher rate of 10.3% (4/42). The difference between primary and revision surgery was statistically significant both for hip and knee.

Considering an infection free arthroplasty as the goal, the overall success rate of treatment was under 48% (30/69). The success of treating infections with debridement and retention of components was even lower (29%). Further analysis revealed a higher success of this approach (45%) when considering more appropriate candidates (short term infections). An interesting statistically significant difference was found favoring this approach in the knee.

Two-stage revision strategy was successful in achieving revision arthroplasty in 43% (20/46) of the cases. Most patients were never considered candidates to the second stage procedure. Knee joint and resistant microorganisms were found to be predictors of bad prognosis.

There was a 90% (18/20) survival rate of revision arthroplasties after two years average follow-up. There were only 2 cases of relapsing infection both controlled without prosthetic removal.

Conclusion: Our results compare poorly with the latest published data from different centers. They led us to implement new prophylactic measures as well as review our diagnostic and treatment options.

Background: Braquial plexus injuries are a major indication for shoulder arthrodesis today. Numerous investigations have addressed the optimal position of the extremity for shoulder arthrodesis, and there are still numerous opinions on the ideal position. The present consensus appears to favor less abduction and forward flexion and more internal rotation.

Purposes: Our main goal is to determine the most favorable position for arthrodesis regarding upper limb function and prevalence of periscapular pain. Secondarily we describe the fusion and complications rate as well as patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods: Between 1997 and 2008 the authors performed a total of 19 shoulder arthrodesis using a pelvic reconstruction plate in patients with braquial plexus injuries. Six were lost to follow-up leaving a total of 11 men and two women with a mean age of 46 years available for review. At a mean follow-up of 101 months [13–149] patients were evaluated clinically using predetermined functional parameters (hand-to-mouth, brachiothoracic grip, etc) and the visual analog pain scale. DASH score and radiological studies were also performed. Three patients that presented no active elbow flexion were excluded of the functional results analysis.

Results: The mean fusion position found was 20° abduction, 32° forward flexion and 44° internal rotation. Abduction ≥ 25° relates to better function as judged by a better hand-to-mouth and brachiothoracic grip ratio as well as a better DASH score (38.8 vs. 45.4) but is also unfortunately related to higher periscapular pain prevalence (VAS pain 3.75 vs. 1.38). Forward flexion ≤ 30° also relates to slightly higher periscapular pain prevalence (VAS pain 2.7 vs. 1.7) and a better DASH score (39.5 vs. 47.7). Exaggerated internal rotation seems to have a negative influence on the functional outcome. Although relating to a surprisingly better DASH score (39.7 vs. 44.9), none of the three patients presenting with internal rotation over 45° was able to reach the mouth with his/her hand. Fusion was obtained in 12 patients. Major complications included one pseudarthrosis, one malpositioning of the extremity that forced a revision surgery to increase internal rotation and one humeral shaft fracture treated conservatively. All but one patient (including those with no active elbow flexion) were satisfied/very satisfied with the final outcome.

Discussion: Our results suggest abduction around 25° and forward flexion of no more than 30° are needed. Higher abduction and lower forward flexion values although relating to better function do so at the expense of more periscapular pain. We agree with the present trend towards increasing internal rotation but found that it should not exceed 45°.

Introduction: Long-term results of radial osteotomy for Kienbock’s disease seldom are seen in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its outcome.

Material: Fifteen patients submitted to radial osteotomy were followed by a mean period of 9,5 years. Mean age at the time of surgery was 32,1 years. On the basis of the Lichtman classification, one patient had Stage II, eight had Stage IIIA and six had Stage IIIB disease.

Methods: Patients were evaluated clinically for pain, grip and range of motion (ROM); radiologically, according to carpal height ratio, Stahl’s index (lunate colapse), and for sclerotic, cystic and degenerative carpal changes. These data were classified according to the Nakamura Scoring System for Kienbock (NSSK).

Results: Ten patients are asymptomatic and five have mild pain. ROM improved significantly by 20,8°. When compared with the contralateral wrist, mean range of motion was 78% in flexion and 76% in extension and mean grip strength was 82,3%. Carpal height ratio and Stahl’s index improved, as shown by a mean NSSK of 24,3 (ten Excellent and five Good results). There was no progression to wrist arthritis.

Discussion: Pain, ROM and grip strength improved significantly after surgery. Despite the mild radiologic changes, there seems to have been an improvement in inner structure of the ischemic lunate.

Conclusions: These results show that Radial Osteotomy is an effective procedure in improving clinical and functional scores, and in preventing wrist arthritis.

Femoral head osteonecrosis is a progressive disease that affects patients in the third to the fifth decades. It is probably a multifactorial disease since many patients that have the known risk factors never develop it and others develop the disease without any risk factors.

There isn’t any totally effective treatment that can stop the disease and prevents bone collapse, but it is known that operative treatment gives better results than conservative treatment in Ficat stages I and II.

The authors began in October of 2003 the surgical treatment of pre-collapse patients (Ficat stage I and II) with the tantalum hip screw hopping that it could prevent progression to collapse.

The tantalum is an innovating new metal with an excellent bio-integration and with mechanic properties very close to normal bone. The tantalum hip screw gives structural support to the necrotic bone segment, permits immediate charging of the affected hip and pretends to be a substitute to peroneal graft.

There isn’t any published clinical result of the use of the tantalum hip screw in the literature to date.

Between the October of 2003 and November of 2004 we made 10 such procedures in 8 patients with mean age of 44 years. The patients were Ficat grade I and II and we could identify that most of the patients had been taking corticosteroid medication. There was one hip with less than 15% of extension and 9 with a severe extension (more than 30% of the femoral head from the University of Pennsylvania system of classification and staging).

There was rapid radiographic progression of the disease in all patients but one with bilateral involvement. There was progression for femoral head collapse in 70% of the patients despite the femoral hip screw. In 3 patients the collapse led to screw protrusion on the acetabulum and needed hip arthroplasty, on average, 12 months after screw implantation.

The harris hip score of the 5 patients (7 hips) than weren’t submitted to hip arthroplasty gave a good result in 1 patient and a fair result in 3 patients (4 hips). There was a poor result in the other patient.

The tantalum hip screw made it more difficult to do a hip arthroplasty but it didn’t make it impossible.

This study shows that the tantalum hip screw didn’t prevent the progression of the femoral neck osteonecrosis in all but one patient with an initial Ficat grade IIa.

The fact that 9 in 10 patients had a severe extension of the disease (> 30% of the femoral head diameter) could have prevented the success of the tantalum hip screw because the area of sustention of the screw was limited and the disease continued to progress around the screw.