Hip resurfacing arthoplasty (HRA) showed promising early and mid-terms results at the beginning of the new millennium. Adverse local tissue reactions associated with metal debris considerably slowed down the implantation of HRA which use is now limited to a few specialized centers. The long term success of this procedure, however, is still largely unknown. This study aimed to provide the clinical results of a series of 400 consecutive HRA with a minimum follow-up of 20 years. All patients treated with Conserve®Plus HRA between November 1996 and November 2000 were retrospectively selected and 355 patients (400 hips) were included. The clinical results of this series was previously reported in 2004 at a follow up of 2 to 6 years[1]. There were 96 women (27%) and 259 men (73%). Mean age at surgery was 48.2 ± 10.9 years. Long-term survivorship was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. UCLA hip scores and SF-12 quality of life scores were collected at follow-up visits. Radiographic positioning of the acetabular component was assessed with the computation of the contact patch to rim (CPR) distance. Radiolucencies about the metaphyseal stem and around the acetabular component were recorded to assess the quality of the component fixation.Background
Methods
Obtaining fixation in DDH with Surface arthroplasty (SA) with a two part polyethylene (PE ) socket was technically challenging. Although dislocation was rare there was a high loosening rate secondary to polyethylene wear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of Conserve Plus metal-on-metal SA in Crowe class I and II Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip patients. 54 patients (59 hips), 72% females, average age43.7 years (15 to 63.8) met these inclusion creteria with 2 years of follow-up minimum. Seven hips were Crowe type II and fifty-two were type I. Harlan C. Amstutz, John Antoniades, Michel J. Le Duff, Paul E. Beaulé The results of MMSA are much improved over those of prior generations of SA and socket fixation is stable even in Crowe type II with the porous coated acetabular components without adjuvant fixation despite incomplete acetabular coverage of the socket. The hips have-been stable even with important range of motion. Recent short term failure and radiolucencies have been eliminated by improved technique despite a high incidence of femoral cysts and reduced area of fixation.
The purpose of this study was to review our entire primary THR experience using large diameter femoral heads in order to prevent dislocation. 83 hips in 77 patients (average age 61years) had a total hip replacement using femoral heads at least 36 mm in diameter. Average follow-up was 4.4 years (range 1 to 17). 22% of the bearings used were conventional UHMWPE, 25% Metal on Metal (two thirds of which were one-piece sockets), and 53% cross-linked polyethylene. UCLA hip scores improved significantly (p<
0.001) to 9.4, 8.4, 7.5, and 5.2, for pain, walking, function and activity respectively. All of the hips were stable at last follow-up although 3 hips had to be revised: 2 for instability in the early post-op period for poorly positioned socket and one for acetabular component aseptic loosening, which was rectified by revision surgery. Two out of these 3 hips had an etiology of DDH. The dislocations occurred in hips reconstructed with a head size less of 36mm only and none of the hips that dislocated had to be revised with a constrained acetabular liner. As the safety of new wear-resistant joint bearings has improved, an increase of femoral head size leads to a lower prevalence of dislocation in THR potentially without adverse wear consequences. However, adequate positioning of the acetabular component remains a key factor in the success of this type of hip arthroplasty. Metal-on-metal, which provides the largest ball size for a given socket diameter, especially with a one-piece socket, best addresses component-to-component impingement by increasing the range of motion. Bone-to-bone impingement risks are also minimized as the travel distance to dislocation is increased by maximizing the head diameter and minimizing the socket shell thickness.
The purpose of the present study was to analyze the-clinical and radiographic factors which determine the enduring fixation of metal on metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. The first 500 hips (in 436 patients) of a consecutive series of over 700 Conserve® plus were reviewed clinically and radiographically. The patients were 48.6 years-old in average, 74% were male and the dominant etiology was idiopathic osteoarthritis (64.6%). All femoral components were cemented but the femoral metaphyseal stem was cemented in 112 hips and press-fit in the remaining 388. Average follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 2.7 to 7.8 years). Eighteen hips were converted to a THR, 11 of them for aseptic loosening of the femoral component at an average follow-up of 40.5 months. Put in positives mention fx and loose incidence, survor ship details of loose and fx for other At last review, 14 hips presented metaphyseal stem radiolucencies and 16 hips (3.2%) showed a narrowing of the neck of 10% or more at the interface with the femoral component. None of the components with cemented stems showed femoral radiolucencies, neck narrowing, or were revised for aseptic loosening. Cementing the femoral stem significantly (p = 0.013) reduces the chances of early femoral failure or appearance of a metaphyseal stem radiolucency. Risk factors for loosening or radioluciences included cysts >
1 cm, small femoral head size, female gender, early cases (before improved acrylic fixation including femoral suctioning measures were instituted) and reduced stem shaft angle. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty provides a stable, bone conserving, low morbidity and wear resistant prosthetic solution well suited for young and highly active patients.