Objective: In 1989 Mirels published a scoring system for identifying impending pathological fractures in long bones. However, the spine is the most common site of skeletal metastases. A MR-based scoring system is proposed to quantify the risk of sustaining a pathological fracture through a metastatic lesion in a vertebral body.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 101 vertebral body metastatic lesions was carried out. The metastases were identified through the onco-radiology database. Only lesions with a MR scan and subsequent imaging within 24-months of the index scan were included. Variables potentially predictive of impending fracture were analysed for significance. The significant variables were then statistically weighted. The original MR scans were scored, and the subsequent imaging was used to identify which lesions fractured. The scores were compared between the fracture and non-fracture group. Analysis was carried out for each predictive variable to establish whether they were individually as good as the scoring system alone in predicting fracture. Intra and inter-observer variability was assessed using kappa statistics.

Results: Twenty-one of the 101 lesions fractured within 24 months. A mean score of 0.65 was identified in the non-fracture group, whilst the fracture group had a mean score of 6.52 (p< 0.0001). The percentage risk of a lesion sustaining a pathological fracture was calculated for any given score. As the score increased above 4, so did the percentage risk of fracture (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 97.5%). Very good intra and inter-observer agreement was present, showing the scoring system to be reliably reproducible.

Conclusions: The authors propose that all painful vertebral body metastatic lesions be evaluated by MR scanning. Lesions with a score of 3 or less can be left untreated. Lesions with scores of 4 or higher are at risk of fracture and should be considered for prophylactic cement augmentation.

Acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are frequently misdiagnosed as there is often no history of preceding trauma. VCFs not only cause back pain, but can also result in a loss of function, spinal deformity and increased mortality. Cement augmentation has been shown to effectively treat these fractures. It is impossible to diagnose an acute fracture on plain x-ray and therefore identify those likely to benefit from this treatment. The definitive investigation to determine the presence of an acute fracture is a MR scan, but this is a limited resource. The aim of this paper is to evaluate 2 new clinical signs which we believe aid in the diagnosis of an acute VCF: firstly closed fist percussion at the level of an acute VCF resulting in a severe, sharp fracture pain, and secondly the inability of a patient to lie supine. This was a prospective study of 78 patients with suspected acute VCFs.

48/78 had an acute fracture on MR. 42/45 patients who were positive for closed fist percussion, had an acute fracture on their MR scan. There were 6 patients who were negative for closed fist percussion who had an acute fracture (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 90%).

39/41 patients who were positive for the supine sign had an acute fracture on their MR scan. There were 9 patients who were comfortably able to lay supine who had an acute fracture (sensitivity 81.25%, specificity 93.33%).

Either a positive closed fist percussion sign or a positive supine sign is a reliable indicator of the presence of an acute VCF. By incorporating these signs into our routine clinical assessment we are better able to predict which patients have an acute fracture, and therefore decide which patients need a MR scan.

Objective: In 1989 Mirels published a scoring system for identifying impending pathological fractures in long bones, and it is now standard practice that long bones with metastases at risk of fracture are treated with prophylactic internal fixation. The spine is the most common site of skeletal metastases, with spinal metastases present in up to 36% of patients with terminal cancer. A pathological fracture through a vertebral body can result in paralysis, incontinence and severe pain. However, there is no equivalent of the Mirels’ scoring system to aid the spinal surgeon in determining the probability of an impending spinal fracture.

A weighted scoring system is proposed to quantify the risk of sustaining a pathological fracture through a metastatic lesion in a vertebral body. This system analyzes and combines four magnetic resonance (MR) risk factors into a single score.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 vertebral body metastatic lesions was carried out. The original MR scans were scored, and the subsequent imaging was used to identify which vertebral body lesions fractured. Patients with no subsequent imaging within 12 months were excluded.

Results: Twenty of the 100 lesions fractured within 12 months. A mean score of 0.64 was identified in the non-fracture group, where as the fracture group had a mean score of 6.80. The percentage risk of a lesion sustaining a pathological fracture was calculated for any given score. As the score increased above 3, so did the percentage risk of fracture (sensitivity 90%, specificity 91%).

Conclusions: The authors propose that all painful vertebral body metastatic lesions be evaluated by MR scanning. Lesions with a score of 2 or less can be left untreated, while lesions with scores of 3 or higher should be considered for prophylactic balloon kyphoplasty.

Background: Sacral tumours are commonly diagnosed late and therefore are often large and at an advanced stage before treatment is instituted. The late presentation means that curative surgical excision is technically demanding¹. Total en-bloc sacrectomy is fraught with potential complications: deep infection, substantial blood loss, large bone and soft tissue defects, bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction, spinal-pelvic non-union, and gait disturbance². The aim of the current study was two-fold: firstly to detail the technique used by the senior author and chronicle how this has evolved; and secondly to present the complications and outcome of nine total en bloc sacrectomies.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed of total en-bloc sacrectomies between 1991 and 2004. Nine patients (2M, 7F, mean age at surgery 39 years, range 21 – 64yrs) with a diagnosis of primary sacral tumour underwent total en-bloc sacrectomy under the care of the senior author. The mean follow-up was 50.2 months (range: 3.5 – 161 mths). Patients’ functional outcome was evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument and the SF-36. Intra-operative and postoperative complications (including disease progression) were documented.

Results: Surgical technique has evolved from single stage surgery without and with colostomy to two stage surgery with colostomy. Currently, the first stage includes an anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4/L5 retaining the L5 nerve roots. In the second stage an L4 to pelvic fusion is performed posteriorally. The dura is tied and divided just below the L5 roots. The mean total operating time was 13.3 hrs (range: 8 – 20.1hrs); the mean total blood loss 14.1 ltrs (range: 4.2 – 33 ltrs). There were two revision L4 to pelvic fusions for pseudoarthroses. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.9mths (range: 2 – 36mths). One patient had a recurrence and died 2 years after her surgery. Of the surviving 8 patients the results from the functional outcome scores were variable. Three patients are able to walk independently; the remaining 5 are all mobile but require differing degrees of assistance to walk.

Conclusion: Total en bloc sacrectomy is a major surgical undertaking but our series has shown that it is probably justified in view of the fact that 8 out of 9 patients have had no tumour recurrence and all are able to walk.