The aim of this study was to review the different surgical modalities for ingrown toenails in the paediatric age group in a hospital setting.
All procedures were carried out under general anaesthetic. The treatment methods practised were:
Nail avulsion with or without nail matrix ablation using phenol. Wedge excision of the nail with or without nail matrix ablation using phenol or thermal ablation.
We also applied the same Fischer’s exact test for rate of infection in all the groups.
During the stage of inflammation, conservative measures in the past have been noted to be successful. In a hospital setting, most patients present in the second stage (infection). Nail avulsion is still commonly practised as a first line treatment. It provides good symptomatic relief in this stage but has been reported to have high rates of recurrence. We noted similar results (recurrence rate: 55%) in our study. Then patients present in the next stage with symptoms of chronic ingrowths i.e. previous infection and presence granulation tissue in the nail fold. The aim of treatment here is to remove the ingrown area along with the nail fold. Wedge excision with or without removal of nail matrix is a commonly performed procedure. There are various methods for removing the nail matrix namely surgical matrixectomy, chemical matrixectomy using phenol or sodium hydroxides, diathermic/electric cauterisation, laser. There are reports that show low recurrence rates with use of phenol. In this study we found recurrence and infection to be high when phenol was used as the ablative agent. We achieved cure rate of 97% when using wedge excision alone and 70% when phenol was used for nail matrix ablation.