Competency levels of AOSpine members (Europe) based on whether or not they had undertaken a full 12 month fellowship in spinal surgery Self-assessment questionnaire distributed to members (60 questions relating to: previous surgical training, fellowships and their nature, and both theoretical and practical competency amongst basic and advanced spinal conditions) 289 completed responses Competency levels with(out) fellowship; differences in fellowship training; overall competence in spinal surgery as neurosurgeons versus those trained as orthopaedic surgeons. Competency defined as those able to deal with complications or able to perform without supervision. 28% (n=80) undertook a full 12 month fellowship Notable differences between groups were identified (fellowship vs no fellowship): spinal deformity (58% vs 26%), cervical trauma (83% vs 59%), cervical stabilisation (78% vs 53%), lumbar and thoracic trauma (85% vs 57%) and anterior surgery (66% vs 41%) and its complications (46% vs 23%). Interestingly of the whole group only 43% were competent in the actual practice of conservative management of spinal conditions. There was no significant difference in theoretical knowledge or practical skills between orthopaedics surgeons and neurosurgeons. Fellowship training is effective, but there are deficiencies in areas. In order to provide a routine and emergency service as a spinal surgeon, competency at relatively common procedures must be reached. Our data demonstrates a lack of uniformity in such competencies, and we believe efforts towards a formal curriculum for spinal training should be embarked upon.
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Ashington, UK To assess if a pain diary is useful in assessment and management of patients who undergo diagnostic nerve root block (NRB) for lumbar radicular pain. Prospective study 23 patients who underwent diagnostic NRB for lumbar radicular pain were given a pain diary. They recorded their response to one of four options from Day 0 to Day 14 (good relief, partial satisfactory, partial unsatisfactory, and no relief of leg pain) and could also add additional comments. A Consultant Spinal Surgeon reviewed the diary with the patient at 6-week follow up appointment to formulate a management plan. Patient response, completion of the pain diary and final clinical outcome (surgical or non surgical treatment). The response rate was 91% (21/23). The pain diary was very useful in 43% (9/21), useful in 33% (7/21) and not useful in 24% (5/21) of patients in formulating further management. There was a tendency for patients with complex problems and poor response to add descriptive notes and comments (9/ 23). Patient compliance with pain diary was good and it has been valuable in making further management decisions. We found the pain diary to be a useful and inexpensive adjunct in the assessment of patients who underwent diagnostic NRB.
Generally, it is considered to be safe in preventing iatrogenic instability if half of the facet joint is left intact during decompression surgeries. By removing half of the facets can we get adequate decompression of the nerve roots? Is there a difference at different levels in the lower lumbar spine? What is the inclination of the facet joint at each level and how does it affect the stability? Retrospective study We analysed 200 consecutive magnetic reasonance imaging (MRI) scans of the lumbosacral spine at L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels. We measured the difference in the distance from midline to the lateral border of the foramen and from midline to the middle of the facet joint at each level on either sides. The angle of the facet joint was also noted. The distance to the foramen from the level of the middle of the facet joints seem to be between 5-6mm lateral at every level. The angle of the facet joints at L3/4 is 35.9°+/−7.4°, while at L4/5 it is 43.2°+/−8.0°, and at L5/S1 it is 49.4°+/−10.1°. In lumbar spine decompression surgeries, after the midline decompression extending up to half of the facet joints, a further undercutting of the facet joints to 5-6mm is therefore required to completely decompress the nerve root in the foramen. The more coronal orientation of the facet joint at L5/S1 conforms better stability than that at L3/4level. Therefore, stabilisation of the spine should be considered if more than 2cm of the posterior elements are removed from midline at L3/4 level.
We described a technique of measuring the flexibility of the rib prominence clinically before surgery, and aimed to analyse the results in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior correction with pedicle screw instrumentation. This prospective study investigated the magnitude of rib humps before and after the operation when the patient was in Adam's forward bending posture. Also preoperatively, a flexion and derotation manoeuvre was performed and the corrected rib prominence was measured. This is compared to the magnitude of the rib hump present postoperatively at three months' follow up. Seven consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis that underwent posterior surgical correction. Clinical measurement of rib prominence using scoliometer. The magnitude of the curve improved from a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 53.6+/−11.2° (range 45.3–72.5°) to a mean postoperative Cobb angle of 7.8+/−9.3° (range 0.4–17.6°). The mean preoperative magnitude of the rib hump was 12.3+/−6.9° (range 5-20°) which was then corrected to a mean magnitude of 1.3+/−2.2° (range 0-5°) by performing the above described flexion derotation manoeuvre. The mean postoperative magnitude of the rib hump was 3.0+/−3.1° (range 0-8°) with the patient in Adam's forward bend position. There was positive correlation between the postoperative residual rib hump and the reduced rib hump measured preoperatively using our described technique (r=0.8,p=0.05). This flexion derotation test is a useful in assessing the amount of postoperative persistent rib hump after posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation with derotation technique.
The footplate in the current available TDR is flat without any allowance for endplate concavity in the sagittal plane. To assess the morphology of the endplates of the lower lumbosacral in the sagittal plane, and to identify the frequently occurring shape patterns of the end plates at each level. Retrospective Study 200 consecutive magnetic reasonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients between the age of 30 and 60 years were analysed. In each endplate, the anteroposterior width, the height of concavity of the endplate, and the distance of the summit from the anterior vertebral body margin were noted. The shape of the endplate was noted as oblong (o) if the curve was uniform starting from the anterior margin and finishing at the posterior margin, eccentric (e) if the curve started after a flat portion at the anterior border and then curving backwards, and flat (f) if there is no curve in the sagittal plane. The shape of the end plate is mostly oblong at L3 IEP(59%), equally distributed between oblong and eccentric at L4 SEP (o=43.5%, e=46.5%), eccentric at L4 IEP (e=62.5%), eccentric at L5 SEP (e = 59.0%), eccentric at L5 IEP (e=94.0%), and flat at S1 SEP (f=82.5%). As there is a difference in the shape of the endplate at each level and they are not uniform, there is a need to focus on the sagittal shape of the footplate to avoid subsidence and mismatch of the footplate in cases of endplate concavity.
