Severe heterotopic ossification (grade III and IV) after contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA) requiring excision is very uncommon. We performed a systematic review of the literature, and report a new case series with operative treatment after primary uncemented THA. A systematic review identified papers describing patients who had excision of heterotopic ossification (HO) after contemporary THA, defined as performed after 1988. Concepts of hip arthroplasty, heterotopic ossification, and surgical excision were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, from database inception to November 2022. Inclusion criteria were: articles that included specific patient data on grade of heterotopic ossification, operative procedure, and prophylaxis. Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent reviewers. Extracted data included demographic data, interval from index surgery to excision, clinical results, and complications. One surgeon performed reoperation for ankylosis of primary THA in three patients with severe pain and deformity. Seven case series or case report studies were included. There were 41 patients, with grade III or IV HO, that had excision, and in five patients, revision of a component was also performed. Perioperative prophylaxis was irradiation alone in 10 patients, irradiation and indomethacin in 10, and indomethacin alone in 21 patients. At a mean follow-up time of 14.8 months, definition of the results was not uniform, and range of motion was improved, but relief of pain was inconsistent. There was one dislocation, one gastrointestinal complication, and two recurrences. Treatment of the three patients, with wide excision of peri-articular bone, selective exchange of components, and peri-operative irradiation prophylaxis, was successful in improving motion and deformity. There is insufficient data on the treatment of severe symptomatic HO after contemporary THA. Prophylaxis with low-dose irradiation was successful to prevent recurrence. Multicenter studies will be needed to determine the optimum timing and prognosis for treatment.
Modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular components are often used to prevent dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). As there is insufficient data on these components, the outcomes were evaluated in a cohort with a mean follow-up time of greater than five years. Using the database of a single academic center, 126 revision THAs (117 patients) with one MDM were retrospectively reviewed. There were 94 hips in 88 patients with a mean follow-up time of 5.5 years. Survivorship analysis was performed with the endpoints of dislocation, reoperation for dislocation, cup revision for aseptic loosening, and cup revision for any reason. The secondary endpoints were perioperative complications and radiographic review.Background
Methods
Many pharmacologic agents have been used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). Rivaroxaban was the first novel oral anticoagulant approved for THA patients, but its actual efficacy and safety in clinical practice, beyond randomized trials, is unknown. This is a retrospective study, using the Truven Health MarketScan database, of anticoagulation medication prescriptions after elective THA, in both commercially insured (CI) and Medicare supplement insured (MS) patients, from 2010 to 2015. After exclusions, there were 83,179 CI and 50,534 MS patients available for analysis. There were 12,876 new users of warfarin (W) and 10,892 new users of rivaroxaban (R) in CI patients, and 7,416 new users of W and 4,739 new users of R in MS patients. We asked the following questions: (1) What were the trends and predictive factors for anticoagulant use after elective THA? (2) What was the actual clinical efficacy: frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and frequency of adverse events within 90 days with the two most commonly used oral agents, rivaroxaban and warfarin, from June 2011 to September 2015? Data was analyzed for each anticoagulant by odds ratios using logistic regression models with stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic hip and spine problems, with surgical treatment indicated for both. Controversy exists over which procedure, total hip arthroplasty (THA) or lumbar spine procedure, should be performed first, and does the surgeon's area of expertise influence the choice. Clinical scenarios were devised for 5 fictional patients with both symptomatic hip and lumbar spine disorders for which surgical treatment was indicated. An email with survey link was sent to 110 clinical members of the Hip Society and 101 experienced spine surgeons in the USA requesting responses to: which procedure should be performed first, and the rationale for the decision with comments. The clinical scenarios were painful hip osteoarthritis and (1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurologic claudication; (2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; (3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; (4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and (5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. Surgeon choices were compared among scenarios and between surgical specialties using chi-square analysis and comments analyzed using text mining.Purpose
Materials & Methods
