Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 363 - 363
1 Nov 2002
Than P Szabò G Kránicz J Bellyei Á
Full Access

Introduction: With the growing number of primary knee arthroplasties, the number of revision operations is also increasing. The large number of unicondylar replacements carried out in the 1980’s, due to lack of modern total condylar implants, grant the revision techniques an outstanding significance in Hungary. One of the main issues of modern revision techniques is the management of bone defects, which can be solved by different methods documented in literature.

Aim of study: The aim of our study was to investigate the success and feasibility of the various defect management techniques by evaluating the results of revision knee prosthetic surgeries carried out at our clinic.

Patients and methods: Femoral and tibial bone defects had to be solved with revision surgeries in 35 cases, all performed due to aseptic loosening of uni- and total condylar prostheses implanted earlier. For filling of bone defects, metal augmentation of the prostheses was applied in 9 cases, allografts from bone bank were used in 11 cases, own cancellous bone was applied in 20 cases. Results were prospectively analysed with the help of the knee society rating system, with an average follow-up of two and a half years.

Results: Revision interventions were successful in 34 cases, detailed results are revealed in the presentation, complemented with case presentations. In a single case, repeated intervention surgery is indicated due to disorganisation of the structural allograft and the resulting loosening of the tibial component.

Conclusion: The success of the various bone replacement techniques, completed with adequate indication could be proven in all cases. The unsuccessful case proved that allograft incorporation should be supported by appropriate stem augmentation of the tibial component. In order to perform successful revision knee arthroplasty, we consider it fundamentally important to have a wide variety of allografts from bone bank and a modern knee prostheses system application already during primary implantations.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 124 - 124
1 Jul 2002
Koòs Z Kránicz J Bálint L
Full Access

Conservative management of talipes equinovarus has a good effect on adductus deformity of the forefoot, whereas equinus deformity cannot usually be treated well conservatively. However, adductus is the most common recurrent deformity after operations. The aim of the study was to use radiological analysis to explore the reasons that lead to recurrent adductus.

In 86.7% of the cases, either a correction was evaluated as radiologically inadequate but seemed to be good physically, or compensation for an operative over-correction resulted in recurrent adductus some years later. In spite of adequate correction from both a physical and radiological view, recurrent adductus developed in 13.3% of the cases. In our opinion, these recurrences were due to persistent muscle imbalance.

In our department, 458 children were operated on for clubfoot from 1982 to 1997. The patients involved in this study were those managed by medial and posterior soft tissue release after an ineffective six to nine month period of conservative treatment that was started when they were one to two weeks old. Children treated previously in another hospital were excluded from the study. We controlled 228 feet and 42 cases of recurrent adductus were found 2 to 16 years (mean 6.8) after the operations. The radiographs were examined at the end of ineffective conservative treatment, during the early postoperative days, and finally at the follow-up. The anteroposterior talocalcaneal (ATC) angle, the talometatarsal (TM) angle and the naviculometatarsal (NM) angle were measured in all of the radiographs. Based on the measured angles, three main groups of patients were formed.

Recurrent adductus in 24 feet (Group A) was caused by inadequate operative corrections, including inappropriate correction of either the hind foot (reduced ATC angle) or the forefoot (reduced NM angle), or both. Although the talocalcaneal and talometatarsal positions were normal in early postoperative radiographs, adductus developed again two to five years later in seven cases (Group B). In these cases, we think that persistent muscle imbalance was responsible for the recurrent deformity.

In 11 feet the ATC angles were in normal range or increased (Group C). These adductus deformities were caused by either an overcorrected talocalcaneal position resulting in compensatory metatarsal varus or medial subluxation of the talonavicular joint, which had been only partially compensated by the lateral deviation of the 1st ray.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 117 - 117
1 Jul 2002
Bálint L Kránicz J Czipri M
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the longterm results of 736 cases of operatively treated clubfeet, and to examine if there is any difference in the results between our patients and referred patients.

A follow-up examination was carried out in 736 cases of clubfeet operated on between 1966 and 1990. The average follow-up period was 14.7 years. Treatment was based on three pillars: well-organized care, conservative treatment and early operative treatment. In all of the reviewed cases, posteromedial soft tissue release was performed. Surgical intervention was indicated in cases of residual deformity after conservative treatment, cases of recurrent deformity, and cases of untreated clubfeet. Clinical evaluation contained the examination of residual deformities and the passive and active motions of the foot. In the radiological assessment, the anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle, the lateral talocalcaneal angle and the talometatarsal angle was measured.

In the clinical evaluations equinus deformity was found in 3.35%, varus in 7.23%, valgus in 8.55%, adducted forefoot in 30.8%, inflexion of the forefoot in 7.14%, and overcorrection to the vertical talus in 3.35%. Range of motion was normal in only 36% of the cases. Average anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle was 13.05 preoperatively and 22.13 postoperatively. Average lateral talocalcaneal angle was 10.78 preoperatively and 27.66 postoperatively. Average talometatarsal angle changed from 26 to 5.5 after the operation. The overall success rate of the operated cases was 65%.

After long-term follow-up, 65% of the cases were classified as successful. When comparing our patients with referred patients, there were considerable differences found in the rate of reoperation, age at the time of the first operation, and also in the results. These differences point out the importance of the early beginning of operative treatment, with regular follow-up and care.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 117 - 117
1 Jul 2002
Bálint L Kránicz J Czipri M
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the longterm results of 736 cases of operatively treated clubfeet, and to examine if there is any difference in the results between our patients and referred patients.

A follow-up examination was carried out in 736 cases of clubfeet operated on between 1966 and 1990. The average follow-up period was 14.7 years. Treatment was based on three pillars: well-organized care, conservative treatment and early operative treatment. In all of the reviewed cases, posteromedial soft tissue release was performed. Surgical intervention was indicated in cases of residual deformity after conservative treatment, cases of recurrent deformity, and cases of untreated clubfeet. Clinical evaluation contained the examination of residual deformities and the passive and active motions of the foot. In the radiological assessment, the anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle, the lateral talocalcaneal angle and the talometatarsal angle was measured.

In the clinical evaluations equinus deformity was found in 3.35%, varus in 7.23%, valgus in 8.55%, adducted forefoot in 30.8%, inflexion of the forefoot in 7.14%, and overcorrection to the vertical talus in 3.35%. Range of motion was normal in only 36% of the cases. Average anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle was 13.05 preoperatively and 22.13 postoperatively. Average lateral talocalcaneal angle was 10.78 preoperatively and 27.66 postoperatively. Average talometatarsal angle changed from 26 to 5.5 after the operation. The overall success rate of the operated cases was 65%.

After long-term follow-up, 65% of the cases were classified as successful. When comparing our patients with referred patients, there were considerable differences found in the rate of reoperation, age at the time of the first operation, and also in the results. These differences point out the importance of the early beginning of operative treatment, with regular follow-up and care.