Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 66 - 66
1 Mar 2006
Kotsovolos E Stafilas K Mandellos G Mitsionis G Xenakis T
Full Access

We present our experience from use of acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty when bone defects are present. From 1987 to 2000, acetabular reinforcement rings were utilized in 59 revisions, in 52 patients with a mean age of 60 years (31–81). In 48 hips, Ganz rings were used and in 11 hips, Burch-Sch-neider rings. For the existing defects of the acetabulum, morsellized bone allograft was used. The patients were evaluated clinically with the modified Merle d’ Aubigne-Postel scale and radiologically with the criteria of Gill-Sledge-Muller. Acetabular reconstruction was successful in 51 of 59 hips (86.5%) after a mean follow-up period of 7 years (2–15). One of the 11 Burch-Schneider rings failed (9.1%) and 7 of the 48 Ganz, raising the failure rate of this ring up to 14.6%. Complications included dislocation in 5 cases, deep vein thrombosis in 2, superficial infection in 1 and pubis rami fracture in 2 cases.

Reinforcement rings in our opinion could be of valuable help in reconstruction of the bone deficient acetabulum. Although in this study, it is not possible for these two rings to be directly compared, Burch-Schneider one appears to have a more clear role and lower failure rate. However, in order to evaluate in a more reliable way the true fate of the acetabular reinforcement rings, especially in the presence of the limited role of biological fixation, longer follow-up time is needed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 112 - 112
1 Mar 2006
Mastrokalos D Kotsovolos E Hantes E Paessler H
Full Access

Aim: To compare two arthroscopic all-inside methods of meniscal refixation (Fast-FixTM by Smith and Nephew and Clearfix screw by Innovasive Devices Inc.) in a prospective study.

Method: 85 patients (mean age 32.7 years) having 87 meniscal repairs (Group C: 27 with Clearfix screw and Group F: 60 with Fast-FixTM) were included in the study.

Ligament stabilizing procedures were done in 46 (54,1%) patients who had ACL deficient knees (18 reconstructions in Group C and 38 in Group F). Only longitudinal lesions in the red/red or red/white zone were repaired. Follow-up averaged 12.3 months with a range from 6 to 25 months. Only longitudinal lesions in the red/red or red/white zone were repaired. Patients were evaluated using clinical examination, the “OAK” knee evaluation scheme and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Criteria for clinical success included absence of joint line tenderness, swelling and a negative McMurray test.

Results: 10 out of 87 repaired menisci (11.5%) were considered as failures according to the above mentioned criteria (3 in Group C (11,1%) and 7 in Group F (11,6%)). According to the “OAK” knee evaluation scheme 68 patients (80.%) had excellent or good result (Group C: 20 (80%), Group F: 48 (80%)). Magnetic resonance imaging, however, showed persisting grade III or IV lesions in 41 (47,1%) of 87 patients with successful result (Group C: 13 (47%), Group F: 28 (46,6%)). Postoperatively, we had 10 complications (11,3%) which were not directly associated with the meniscal repair device (Group C: 2 (3,7%), Group F: 7 (11,6%)).

Conclusion: Risk factors for failure of meniscus repair are chronicity of injury, location of tear more than 3 mm from the meniscosynovial junction and meniscus side (medial). At all events, both methods seem to be very promising because of their efficasy, safety and ease to use.