Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 443 - 443
1 Jul 2010
Penna V Babeto E Toller E Becker R Pinheiro C Pires L Valsechi M Kerr L Peitl P Rahal P Morini S
Full Access

The giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is a locally aggressive intraosseous neoplasm, with an uncertain biological behavior, constituted of giant multinuclear cells spread over tumoral tissue with a nucleus presenting the same features of the ovoid and fusiform cells forming its stroma. The local recurrence of GCT is often observed, mainly in the first three years after treatment, giving a rate of recurrence ranging in 20 to 50% of cases. Further aggravating the recurrence is the fact that after the relapse, the patient often also presents metastases in other organs.

The aim of this study was to identify and to characterize differentially expressed genes that can be used in the prognostic, treatment and understanding of this physiopathology. To identify novel genes differentially expressed in GCT, we have applied rapid subtractive hybridization (RaSH). Samples of GCT and normal tissues were obtained at Tumor Bank of Barretos Cancer Hospital. After RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis the samples were submitted to Rapid hybridization Subtraction (RaSH) methodology for subtractive libraries elaboration.

The RaSH subtractive libraries reveals the presence of 619 different clones including both normal and tumor tissues were identified. Of these, 450 in tumor sample and 169 in control tissue. Four biomarkers candidates were selected for validation: ZAK, KTN1, NEB, and ROCK1 genes, whose functions are, related to cell cycle checkpoint, transport of organelles, cytoskeletal matrix and cell adhesions. The validation of selected differentially expressed genes was performed using real time PCR. The putative molecular markers found in this work may help to find the basis for a molecular comprehension of GCT, thus improving diagnosis, treatment and outcome for patients with this tumor.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 547 - 547
1 Aug 2008
Meek RMD Allan DB McPhillips G Kerr L Howie CR
Full Access

Introduction: Instability after total hip arthroplasty is an important complication. It commonly occurs in the immediate postoperative period, but the risk is reported to continue over time. There are numerous surgical treatment options, but they have relatively unpredictable outcomes. Numerous factors have been associated with dislocation, but research has mainly focused on surgical factors. Epidemiological factors remain the subject of much debate. We aimed to establish the incidence of dislocation over time.

Methods: The Scottish National arthroplasty non-voluntary registry is based on SMR01 records (Scottish Morbidity Record) data. We analyzed the Scottish National Arthroplasty Project to find patients’ dislocation rates up to 12 years post surgery.

Results: There were 62,175 total hip arthroplasties performed from April 1989 to March 2004 with an annual incidence of dislocation of 0.9%. The majority of dislocations occur by 12 months (66%) but patients remain at relatively high risk even after the first 3 months by when only 23% of the total have occurred. We found no increase in the rate of dislocation after 2 years.

Discussion: Patients should be warned that the risk of dislocation remains for the first year. However, it appears there is no late increase in dislocation rate associated with wear and declining mental or muscle function.