header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Trauma

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 288 - 288
1 Sep 2012
Kristensen M Kehlet H
Full Access

Purpose

Clinicians need knowledge about early and valid predictors of short-term outcome of patients with hip fracture, to adjust and plan rehabilitation. The concept of multimodal rehabilitation has proven effective. Still, some patients do not regain basic mobility independency in the acute orthopaedic setting. The aim was to examine the predictive value of age, sex, prefracture functional level, mental and health status, and fracture type of in-hospital basic mobility outcome, and discharge destination after hip fracture surgery.

Subjects

A total of 213 consecutive patients (157 women and 56 men) with a median age of 82 (25–75% quartile, 75–88) years, admitted from their own home, and following a multimodal rehabilitation concept, were included. Fifty percent of patients had a high prefracture functional level, evaluated by the New Mobility Score (NMS), 77 and 62% had respectively, a high mental and health status, and the distribution of cervical versus intertrochanteric fractures were equally divided.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 309 - 309
1 Sep 2012
Palm H Krasheninnikoff M Holck K Lemser T Foss N Jacobsen S Kehlet H Gebuhr P
Full Access

Introduction

We implemented an exhaustive operative and supervision algorithm for surgical treatment of hip fractures primarily based on own previously published literature. The purpose was to improve supervision and reduce the rate of reoperations.

Materials and methods

2000 consecutive unselected patients above 50 years admitted with a hip fracture were included, 1000 of these prospectively after implementation of the algorithm. Demographic parameters, hospital treatment and reoperations within the first postoperative year were assessed from patient records.

The algorithm dictated the surgical treatment based on three objective patient parameters: age, new mobility score and fracture classification on pre-operative anterior-posterior and axial radiographs. Intra capsular fractures were treated with two parallel implants, a sliding hip screw, an arthroplasty or resection of the femoral head. Extra capsular fractures were treated with a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary nail. Supervision of junior registrars was mandatory for the prosthesis and intramedullary nail procedures.