The royal victoria hospital is a tertiary trauma centre receiving pelvic injury referrals for a population of 1.7 million. The use of ilio-sacral screw fixation with low anterior frame stabilisation has been adopted as the principle treatment for unstable pelvic ring injuries in our institution. We aim to describe our practice and outcomes following the use of percutaneous screw fixation of the pelvis.

The review included standardised assessment of health-related quality of life (SF-36) as well as the Iowa pelvic score and Majeed pelvic injury outcome scores. Data was also collected on associated injuries, post-operative complications, nerve injury and pain scores.

A total case series of 45 patients undergoing percutaneous ilio-sacral screw fixation following traumatic pelvic injury were identified over a 5 year period. Of these 23 were contactable to follow-up or responded to questionnaire review.

The mean follow up was 680 days (range 151–1962). The mean age was 33 (range 18–57).

The mean SF-36 physical and mental scores were 38 and 46 respectively. The mean Majeed score was 69 and Iowa pelvic score was 65. The mean pain score was 3.5 (range 0–7). There were no incidences of deep infection, post-operative PE or nerve injury related to screw insertion.

Patients with isolated pelvic injuries performed better on outcome scoring however the low SF-36 scores highlight the severity of pelvic injuries

Currently there is an elevated public awareness of the consequences of nosocomial infection, of which, 14.5% is due to surgical site infection (SSI). Hip fracture patients are at increased risk of SSI due to their age related poor medical health, immune response impairments and decreased capacity of wound healing. Superficial SSI following hip fracture surgery can affect up to 16.9% with deep infection affecting 3.7%. Deep infection represents a major complication, from which hip fracture patients are 4.5 times less likely to survive to discharge and carries a 50% mortality at 1 year, compared to 33% without infection. Treatment requires a prolonged hospital stay, additional diagnostic testing, antibiotic therapy and surgery, resulting in the total cost of treating deep infection to be more than double that of non-infected hip fracture surgery.

Wound closure aims to accurately appose the skin edges thereby promoting rapid healing and restoration of the protective dermal barrier. Failure to provide accurate skin apposition can result in delayed wound healing which has been shown to have a 3 fold risk of developing late infection. Importantly, delayed wound healing is reflected by prolonged wound ooze. We hypothesized that skin closure via sutures is better at achieving skin edge apposition than wounds closed with staples, providing more rapid wound healing. We compared staples and sutures for wound closure in hip fracture patients by using ooze duration as an outcome measure for wound healing.

Duration of wound ooze was recorded in 170 patients. 65 wounds, closed with sutures, had an average duration of ooze of 1.82 days. 105 wounds, closed with staples, had an average duration of ooze of 4.97 days. This study suggests that sutures are superior to staples with regard to early wound healing in hip fracture patients.