Patellofemoral (PF) complications are among the most frequently observed adverse events after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It has been reported that PF complications after TKA include decreasing knee range of motion, anterior knee pain, quadriceps and patellar-tendon rupture, patellar subluxation, and partial abrasion and loosening of the patellar component. Although recent improvements in surgical technique and prosthetic design have decreased these complications, the percentage of patients who have a revision TKA for PF complications still ranged up to 6.6% to 12%. For the present study, we hypothesized that the alignment of the femoral component is correlated with PF contact stress. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between femoral component alignment and PF contact stress in vivo, using a pressure sensor in patients who had favorable extension-flexion gap balance during TKA. Thirty knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis that underwent posterior stabilized mobile-bearing TKA using identical prostheses (PFC Sigma RPF; Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) by a single surgeon (TM) with modified gap technique under a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system (Vector Vision 1.61; Brain Lab, Heimstetten, Germany) were evaluated. PF contact stress was measured intraoperatively and compared with the alignment of the femoral component including intraoperative navigation data concerning medial shift of the patella and lateral tilt of the patella, postoperative coronal femoral component angle (alpha angle), postoperative sagittal femoral component angle (gamma angle), postoperative condylar twist angle (CTA), postoperative lateral condylar lift-off angle, and postoperative mechanical femoral component angle (mFCA). In addition, postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio (I-S ratio) was measured by dividing the length of patellar tendon by the greatest diagonal length of the patella.Introduction
Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established procedure associated with excellent clinical results. We have previously reported that intraoperative knee kinematics correlate with the clinical outcome in mobile bearing TKA. In addition, the intraoperative knee kinematics pattern does not correlate with the degree of preoperative knee deformity in mobile bearing TKA. However, the relationship among preoperative knee deformity, intraoperative kinematics and clinical outcome in fixed bearing TKA has been unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the relationship among preoperative knee deformity, knee kinematics after fixed bearing TKA and the clinical outcome including the subjective outcomes evaluated by the new knee society score (KSS). A cross-sectional survey of thirty-five consecutive medial osteoarthritis patients who had a primary TKA using a CT-based navigation system was conducted. All knees had a Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 4 in the medial compartment and underwent a primary posterior stabilized TKA (Genesis II, Smith&Nephew) between May 2010 and October 2012. In all cases, a computed tomography-guided navigation system (Brain LAB, Heimstetten, Germany) was used. All surgery was performed by the subvastus approach and modified gap technique. Intraoperative knee kinematics was measured using the navigation system after implantation and closure of the retinaculum and soft tissue except for the skin. Subjects were divided into two groups based on intraoperative kinematic patterns: a medial pivot group (M group, n=19)(Figure 1) and a non-medial pivot group (N group, n=16)(Figure 2). Subjective outcomes with the new KSS and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis to compare the two groups was made using unpaired a Student t test.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The effect of the implant posterior condylar offset has recently generated much enthusiasm among researchers. Some reports were concerned about the relationship between the posterior condylar offset and an extension gap. However, the posterior condylar offset was measured in a flexed knee position or in reference to femoral anatomy alone. Posterior femoral condylar offset relative to the posterior wall of the tibia (posterior offset ratio; POR) is possibly the risk of knee flexion contracture associated with posterior femoral condylar offset after TKA. However, there are no reports concerning the relationship between POR and flexion contracture in vivo. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between the measurement of POR and flexion contracture of the knee in vivo. Twenty-seven patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty (PFC Sigma RP-F) were participated in the study. The lateral femoro-tibial angle (lateral FTA) was measured using lateral radiographs obtained by two procedures. Two procedures are applied to obtain true lateral radiographs of the lower extremities. (1) Full-length true lateral radiographs on standing, (2) True lateral radiographs in the prone position (Fig. 1A). ‘Posterior offset ratio’ was defined as Fig. 1B. Significant differences among groups were assessed using two-tailed Student's t-tests. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between lateral FTA and posterior offset ratio of patients.Introduction
Methods
We have previously reported that patients who demonstrated medial pivot kinematics pattern after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had better clinical results than that of non-medial pivot pattern. However, it is unclear how preoperative kinematics pattern affects postoperative knee kinematics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative knee kinematics pattern in TKA. The present study consists of 38 patients with medial osteoarthritis who underwent a primary TKA using a CT-based navigation system from July 2010 to September 2012. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon using a subvastus approach and the same posterior cruciate ligament substituting type (PS type) of prosthesis (Genesis II™ total knee system, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN). The proximal tibia osteotomy and the distal femur osteotomy were set on the navigation system perpendicular to the mechanical axis in the coronal plane with 3° tibial posterior inclination in the sagittal plane. The coronal plane ligament imbalance was corrected until the gap imbalance was fewer than 2 mm. This gap balance was checked using a ligament balancer (Smith & Nephew) at 80 N in medial and lateral compartment of the knee. The navigation system was used to measure the flexion gap with the CAS ligament balancer (Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) at 90° knee flexion. The amount of external rotation on femoral osteotomy was adjusted by the navigation system with a balanced gap technique. The patella was resurfaced and a lateral release was not performed. Tibial A-P axis of the tibial tray was placed parallel to Akagi's line. We measured each kinematics pattern immediately after capsule incision (preoperative knee kinematics) and after implantation (postoperative knee kinematics) in TKA. Subjects were divided into two groups based on kinematics patterns: a medial pivot group (group M) and a non-medial pivot group (group N). A chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.Introduction
Materials and Methods
It is widely accepted that navigation system for TKA improves precision in component alignment. Furthermore, some of the system can measure knee kinematics during surgery. On the other hand, the measurements of kinematics during surgery have limitations because of anesthesia and usage of air tourniquet. The purpose of the present study is to compare the knee kinematics during surgery using navigation system and that after surgery using 2D/3D Registration Technique. Our final goal of the study is to improve clinical outcome by performing feedback of good clinical results to operating theater by means of kinematic analysis. Kinematics of ten TKA knees for female (average age 71 years old) medial compartmental osteoarthritic knees concerning axial rotation and anterior-posterior translation were measured twice, the time during surgery and 4 weeks after surgery. During surgery, measurement was performed using CT based navigation system (Vector Vision 1.6, Brain LAB, Heimstetten, Germany). Four weeks after surgery, knee kinematics was measured again using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design models to reproduce the position of metallic implants from single-view fluoroscopic images. Surgery was performed by single surgeon using subvastus approach to eliminate the influence of approach to muscle balance. Implant using the present study was P.F.C. Sigma RP-F (DePuy, Warsaw, USA). Axial rotation in navigation and 2D/3D are 12.3+/−2.3, and 12.6+/−3.8, respectively. Axial rotations in both of the measurement have the same pattern. A-P translations also have the same pattern between measurement in navigation and that in 2D/3D technique. These results suggested that intraoperative kinematic measurement links to postoperative kinematics. Studies of correlations between kinematics and good clinical results are ongoing.
