Introduction: The clinical results of the modular Charnley Elite total hip system have been the subject of some interest in recent years. Some studies have shown significant subsidence and rotational instability in some stems when used with low-viscosity cement. These unstable stems have been shown to fail early. This purpose of this study is to demonstrate our conflicting clinical results.

Materials and Methods: 616 modular Charnley Elite total hip arthroplasties were inserted between 1995 and 2002 at Wrightington Hospital, which is a tertiary referral centre and centre of excellence for joint replacement in United Kingdom. Both Consultants and trainees performed operations and a variety of surgical approaches were used. Normal viscosity bone cement was used in all patients. All patients were followed up prospectively.

Results: At mean follow-up of 8 years (range 5–12), 471 hips were available for review. 87 patients had died and 12 were lost to follow-up. 2.7% (13 cases) of femoral components and 2.9% (14 cases) of acetabular components had been revised for aseptic loosening. 10 hips (2.1%) underwent revision for deep infection and 2 (0.04%) for recurrent dislocation. The overall survival with aseptic loosening as an end point was 97% and for revision for any reason was 94.5%.

Conclusion: Our results show acceptable clinical survivor-ship for this implant when used with standard viscosity cement. This contrasts with the lower survivorship rates published by other centres. Our result should reassure patients and surgeons alike that this prosthesis can be associated with acceptable results in the medium term.

Introduction: The clinical results of the modular Charnley Elite total hip system have been the subject of some interest in recent years. Some studies have shown significant subsidence and rotational instability in stems when used with low-viscosity cement. These unstable stems have been shown to fail early. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate our conflicting clinical results.

Materials and Methods: 616 modular Charnley Elite total hip arthroplasties were inserted between 1995 and 2002 at Wrightington Hospital, which is a tertiary referral centre and centre of excellence for joint replacement in United Kingdom. Both Consultants and trainees performed operations and a variety of surgical approaches were used. Normal viscosity bone cement was used in all patients. All patients were followed up prospectively.

Results: At mean follow-up of 8 years (range 5–12), 471 hips were available for review. 87 patients had died and 12 were lost to follow-up. 2.7% (13 cases) of femoral components and 2.9% (14 cases) of acetabular components had been revised for aseptic loosening. 10 hips (2.1%) underwent revision for deep infection and 2 (0.04%) for recurrent dislocation. The overall survival with aseptic loosening as an end point was 97% and for revision for any reason was 94.5%.

Conclusion: Our results show acceptable clinical survivor-ship for this implant when used with standard viscosity cement. This contrasts with the lower survivorship rates published by other centres. Our result should reassure patients and surgeons alike that this prosthesis can be associated with acceptable results in the medium term.

Introduction: Hip Resurfacing has increased in popularity, particularly in young, active patients. However, concerns remain regarding metal ion levels, hypersensitivity leading to aseptic lymphocytic-vasculitis-associated lesions(ALVAL) and AVN. The purpose of this study was to document our experience of revising resurfacing arthroplasty for ALVAL.

Methods: All patients undergoing conversion of hip resurfacing to total hip replacement at our institution were reviewed. The notes were reviewed for the reason for revision, the make of the implant, time interval between primary procedure and revision and final diagnosis. Radiographs were reviewed to assess for implant alignment, signs of loosening, neck thinning and AVN.

Results: Out of the 34 patients who had revision surgery 13 were revised for suspected ALVAL, with mean age of 58.8 years at a mean 42.9 months following primary surgery. Of the 13 resurfacings revisions 11 were Birmingham resurfacing and 1 each of Cormet and ASR resurfacing. Groin pain was the presenting complaint in all patients, 5 patients developed their symptoms immediately postoperatively whilst 8 developed symptoms at mean 28.25 months. Haematological investigations were non-diagnostic. Radiographs were normal in 4 patients, whilst 4 demonstrated a loose cup. Thinning of femoral neck and vertical cup alignment were present in 2 patients each while 1 patient had both vertical cup and thinning of femoral neck. All revisions were achieved with primary implants and all patients had immediate pain relief after surgery. Implants and tissue were sent for laboratory analysis. 3 patients had a confirmed histological diagnosis of ALVAL, the remaining cases had identical operative findings and are presumed ALVAL.

Discussion: ALVAL accounts for nearly 1/3 of all our revisions for failed resurfacing arthroplasty. Unexplained pain in patients with resurfacing arthroplasty should be considered for a diagnosis of ALVAL and investigated appropriately. Symptoms tend to resolve reliably following conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Introduction: Good intermediate term results have been reported using a hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty (uncemented acetabular component with cemented stem) for osteoarthritis. Concerns have been highlighted recently regarding osteolysis behind the acetabular component. We present our results using the uncemented Aesculap plasma cup with an Exeter cemented femoral stem.

Methods: Outcome of 142 primary hip replacements (124 patients) at Derby Royal Infirmary between 1992–1998 was assessed. Most cases had a 28mm articulation, either Orthinox or ceramic. There were 60 men and 64 women, of mean age 55 (range 33–71). Mean time to follow up was 8.65 years (Range 7–13 years). Radiographic assessment was made to assess wear, acetabular lysis and loosening of the components. A clinical assessment and case note review was also performed.

Results: Of 142 hips, 2 were lost to follow up and 4 patients (6 hips) had died (unrelated causes). Of these, 7 revisions were performed; 3 for osteolysis, and 1 each for infection, acetabular wear, recurrent dislocation and early cup aseptic loosening. 9 hips were identified to have asymptomatic osteolysis (6 acetabular and 2 femoral). Mean rate of linear wear was 0.2mm/year for all hips, but 0.4mm/year for those with osteolysis. No cups without supplementary screw fixation developed acetabular osteolysis.

Conclusions: Our data suggests that there is a significant rate of acetabular osteolysis at intermediate (10 year) follow up of this combination of primary hybrid total hip replacement, often in association with increased acetabular wear. This can be asymptomatic and may lead to the need for complex revision surgery in the future. The failure rate is however significantly lower than in other reported studies with the same basic implants, but differing bearing diameters. This study highlights the need for close radiographic follow up of these patients, and the issue of subtle differences in the articulating surface.