To establish relative fixation strengths of a single lateral locking plate, a double locking plate, and a tibial nail in treatment of proximal tibial extra-articular fractures. Three groups of composite tibial synthetic bones consisting of 5 specimens per group were included; lateral plating (LP) using a LCP-PLT (locking compression plate-proximal lateral tibia), double plating (DP) using a LCP-PLT and a LCP-MPT (locking compression plate-medial proximal tibia), and intramedullary nailing (IN) using an ETN (expert tibial nail). To simulate a comminuted fracture model, a gap osteotomy measuring 1 cm was cut 8 cm below the joint. For each tibia, a minimal preload of 100N was applied before loading to failure. A vertical load was applied at 25mm/min until tibia failure.Background
Methods
Although gradual bone transport may provide a large-diameter bone, complications are common with the long duration of external fixation. To reduce such complications, a new technique of bone transport with a locking plate has been done for tibial bone defect. In 13 patients (mean age, 38.9 years) of chronic osteomyelitis or traumatic bone defect, segmental transport was done using external fixator with a locking plate. In surgical technique, a locking plate was fixed submuscularly, holding the proximal and distal segments. Then, the external fixator for transport was fixed without contact of the locking plate. After docking, 2 or 3 screws were fixed at the transported segment through the plate holes. At the same time, the external fixator was removed.Background
Methods
No study compared the clinical results of the posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee with those of nonposterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee in the same patients. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the clinical and radiographic results, range of motion, patients satisfaction, and complication rates would be better in the knees with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee than in the knees with a nonposterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee. One hundred and fourteen patients (mean age, 67.9 years) received a nonposterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in one knee and a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in the contralateral knee. Seven patients were men, and 107 were women. At the time of each follow-up (mean, 7.3 years; range, seven to 7.6 years), the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically.Background
Methods
