Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Introduction: Closed and open grade I (low energy) tibial shaft fractures are a common and costly event and optimal management for such injuries remains uncertain.
Methods: We explored costs associated with treatment of low energy tibial fractures with either casting, casting with therapeutic ultrasound, or intramedullary nailing (with and without reaming) by use of a decision tree.
Results: From a governmental perspective the mean associated costs were USD $3 365 (standard deviation [SD] ± 1 425) for operative management by reamed intramedullary nailing, $5 041 (SD ± 1 363) for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, $5 017 (SD±1 370) for casting, and $5 312 (SD±1 474) for casting with therapeutic ultrasound. From a societal perspective the mean associated costs were ($12 449; SD±4 894) for reamed intramedullary nailing, ($13 266; SD±3 692) for casting with therapeutic ultrasound, ($15 571; SD±4 293) for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, and ($17 343; SD±4 784) for casting alone.
Interpretation: Our analysis suggests that, from an economical standpoint, reamed intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures. There is preliminary evidence, from a societal perspective, that treatment of low energy tibial fractures with therapeutic ultrasound and casting may also be an economically-sound intervention.