Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 293 - 293
1 Jul 2011
Tsiouri C Jeffery M Mok D
Full Access

Aim: The aim of our study was to review the massive rotator cuff tears that were repaired arthroscopically and evaluate the clinical results in respect to repair integrity as well as the effect on the progression of osteoarthritis.

Materials and Methods: We reviewed 56 (39 male,17 female) consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of their massive rotator cuff tears using biodegradable anchors by the senior author. The technique relies on the suspension bridge principal as described by S.Burkhart (1997). The mean age was 68.2 years (30–86) with most patients between 75 and 85 years. The mean follow up was 31months (24–41). Objective evaluation was done using the Constant score and subjective with the Oxford score. Osteoarthritis was investigated with radiographs and repair integrity with ultrasound. SPSS 16 for Windows was used for the statistical analysis of out results.

Results: 93% of the patients had good (11%) or excellent results according to the Oxford score and 91% had Constant score over 75. The improvement in the scores was significant statistically in all parameters (p=0.000, p for strength=0.001). Thirteen patients had postoperative OA, but this was not correlated with the results or the improvement and 11/13 had excellent Oxford scores and Constant scores over75. Seventeen patients had a re-tear which was not correlated with the results or the improvement and 15/17 had excellent Oxford scores and Constant scores over 75. Seven patients had both osteoarthritis and retear but again improvement and results were not affected.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears has excellent clinical results regardless of the development of osteoarthritis or the repair integrity and should be the first line of treatment.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 155 - 155
1 Jul 2002
Jeffery M Scott G Freeman MAR
Full Access

Twenty-nine patients (30 hips) with uncemented acetabular impaction allografting contained behind a metal backed component screwed to the pelvis at revision hip arthroplasty were reviewed at 12 to17 years (average 15.3 years) follow up. Five patients had died with the prosthesis in situ, 4 patients were lost to follow up, 13 patients had failed requiring further revision (only one failed prior to 5 years) and 9 survivors were minimally asymptomatic. The mean time to failure warranting further surgery was 9 years.

Analysis of available serial radiographs (24 cases) demonstrated signs of loosening (migration, progressive radiolucent lines, screw breakage) in 54% of the latest radiographs of all cases. Removing those lost to follow up or deceased, 72% were radiologically loose (in the intact asymptomatic group 57% could be defined as loose). Additionally, in 70% of the cases the acetabular component tended to fail in a varus manner as the medial wall remodelled.

These results indicate as previously published, short term results for this technique are satisfactory but in the long term they are not. Factors associated with this include the pressfit nature of the polyethylene liner which has been implicated in disappointing long term results for this prosthesis in primary applications, but not of the level of failure encountered in the current series. This experience suggests that the reliance on screw fixation over a bed of allograft in the absence of cement supplementation does not provide sufficient stability for reliable bone graft incorporation.

The method reported above should be abandoned.