Purpose: The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has shown improvement in both pain control and function in recent studies. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze functional outcomes and strength in patients following the use of the Delta III prosthesis in a single center.

Method: Patients treated by one of two surgeons were prospectively evaluated following RTSA. An independent observer administered the Constant Score, SF-12, Shoulder Osteoarthritis (SOAQ), ASES, DASH questionnaires and patient satisfaction. Isometric strength testing was performed using the Powertrack II dynamometer. Follow-up for all patients was available up to 5 years following surgery.

Results: The Delta III RTSA was performed on 51 study patients (67% female, mean age 74 (SD=10)). Improvements following surgery were noted in Quality of life (SF-12 Physical Summary= 30 to 38); shoulder disability (SOAQ= 144 to 79; ASES 7 to 15; DASH= 61 to 46; Constant 21 to 56), Symptoms (SOAQ symptoms 40 to 22), Physical impairments as determined by strength (External rotation = 3 to 5 Nm, Abduction 4 to 10 Nm); and ROM (Flexion= 51 to 115°, abduction 45 to 106°); p< 0.05. All patients had follow up between 2–5 years. Satisfaction was high (86% extremely, 3% not at all).

Conclusion: Our data demonstrates significant improvements in quality of life, symptoms, patient satisfaction and disability with reduced and high at more than 2 years following RTSA. Novel to this study is improved objective evidence of strength in functional planes of motion. This is the first Canadian study to demonstrate such improvements in patients following RTSA.

There has been concern over the safety of the upright position for shoulder surgery from anaesthetists uncomfortable with the risk of reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF). Because there are no studies documenting what happens to CBF during upright surgery we aimed to measure CBF through an indirect and non-invasive method using recently available Ultrasound monitoring equipment.

This study randomised patients into awake (interscalene block alone) and GA with block, and indirectly measured the CBF by using a validated Doppler technique on carotid flow both before and during the shoulder procedure. Non-invasive and invasive measurements of mean arterial pressure were made throughout the procedure, together with doppler measurement of carotid flow following preoperative measurement of carotid contribution to cerebral flow in the radiology department by an experienced sonographer. All measurements recorded in real time and charted independently.

This study has shown that CBF in both groups were consistent with the expected values, and CBF remained proportionate in supine to upright. CBF values in the block alone group were generally lower than the GA group. In the GA group the MAP dropped lower, requiring use of adrenergic drugs to bring the pressure up. Despite the significant drop in MAP, the CBF was still high. This could signify cerebral autoregulation is a significant factor in the upright position.

We have shown the feasibility of use of DOppler to indirectly measure CBF during upright surgery. Despite the predicted drop in MAP in this position with GA, we could NOT show a concurrent drop in CBF, demonstrating that much more complex factors regulate the CBF in these patients. Clearly, monitoring is the key to safe administration of anaesthetic in the upright position.