The aim of this study was to review the surgical complications and clinical outcomes of patients with Pilon fractures treated with Ilizarov frames. Data collected included surgical complications, grade of initial injury using the Ruedi-Allgower classification and quality of reduction according to the Teeny and Wiss criteria. Outcome scores were collected retrospectively using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI).Background:
Methods:
Interbody fusion aims to treat painful disc disease by demobilising the spinal segment through the use of an interbody fusion device (IFD). Diminished contact area at the endplate interface raises the risk of device subsidence, particularly in osteoporosis patients. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether vertebral body (VB) cement augmentation would reduce IFD subsidence following dynamic loading. Twenty-four human two-vertebra motion segments (T6–T11) were implanted with an IFD and distributed into three groups; a control with no cement augmentation; a second with PMMA augmentation; and a third group with calcium phosphate (CP) cement augmentation. Dynamic cyclic compression was applied at 1Hz for 24 hours in a specimen specific manner. Subsidence magnitude was calculated from pre and post-test micro-CT scans. The inferior VB analysis showed significantly increased subsidence in the control group (5.0±3.7mm) over both PMMA (1.6±1.5mm, p=.034) and CP (1.0±1.1mm, p=.010) cohorts. Subsidence in the superior VB to the index level showed no significant differences (control 1.6±3.0mm, PMMA 2.1±1.5mm, CP 2.2±1.2mm, p=.811). In the control group, the majority of subsidence occurred in the lower VB with the upper VB displaying little or no subsidence, which reflects the weaker nature of the superior endplate. Subsidence was significantly reduced in the lower VB when both levels were reinforced regardless of cement type. Both PMMA and CP cement augmentation significantly affected IFD subsidence by increasing VB strength within the motion segment, indicating that this may be a useful method for widening indications for surgical interventions in osteoporotic patients.
Metatarsal fractures are extremely common injuries accounting for 10% of all fractures seen in our accident and emergency departments (3). The vast majority can be treated conservatively. There is no standardised treatment, but it is commahplace to immobilise the foot and ankle joint in a below-knee back-slab, full cast or functional brace for a period of up to 6 weeks, weight-bearing the patient as pain allows. This practice is time-consuming and expensive, not to mention debilitating, and carries a morbidity risk to the patient. We describe a simple, effective and cheap treatment method for metatarsal fracture management using the functional forefoot-offloading shoe (FOS). This is clinically proven to offload pressure on the metatarsals and is commonly used in both elective forefoot surgery and in diabetic patients. Between January and September 2009, we identified 57 patients attending our fracture clinic with new metatarsal fractures. 28 met our inclusion criteria. All patients reported a significant improvement in their pain At Injury – mean 8.21 out of 10 (range 4-10) After FOS fitting - mean 2.92 out of 10 (range 0-6) The forefoot-offloading shoe is an excellent alternative to plaster casting or functional boot immobilisation, offering high patient satisfaction, an excellent outcome and a considerable cost-saving to the hospital trust.
We conducted a study comparing the midterm outcome of the Medial Pivot knee (MP) to the Posterior Stabilised (PS) knee.