The risk for developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) as a consequence of bacteremia is not clear, except for All patients with a primary knee or hip joint replacement performed between September 2002 and December 2013 in a tertiary care hospital (n=14 378) were retrospectively followed up until December 2014. The mean follow-up time was 6.0 years (range 0–12 years). Positive blood culture results of the patients during the study period were obtained. PJIs during the study period were identified from several data sources. PJIs as a consequence of bacteremia were recorded and confirmed from patient records. Primary PJIs resulting in bacteremia were excluded. Binary logistic regression with univariate analysis was used to study potential risk factors for PJI among those with bacteremia.Aim
Method
Up to 10% of fractures result in undesirable outcomes, for which female sex is a risk factor. Cellular sex differences have been implicated in these different healing processes. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying bone healing and sex differences in this process is key to improved clinical outcomes. This study utilized a macrophage–mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) coculture system to determine: 1) the precise timing of proinflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage transition for optimal bone formation; and 2) how such immunomodulation was affected by male A primary murine macrophage-MSC coculture system was used to demonstrate the optimal transition time from M1 to M2 (polarized from M1 with interleukin (IL)-4) macrophages to maximize matrix mineralization in male and female MSCs. Outcome variables included Alizarin Red staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and osteocalcin protein secretion.Objectives
Methods
Patients use antibiotics for various reasons before elective joint replacement surgery, but it is not known how common this is. The aim of this study was to investigate patients' use of oral antibiotics before elective joint replacement surgery and how this affects the risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a one-year follow-up. Patients with a primary hip or knee replacement performed in a tertiary care hospital between September 2002 and December 2013 were identified (23 171 joint replacements, 10 200 hips and 12 971 knees). Information on oral antibiotics purchased within 90 days before the operation was gathered from a national database. The occurrence of a PJI, identified by prospective infection surveillance, in a one-year follow-up was the primary outcome. The occurrence of any surgical site infection was analyzed as a secondary outcome. The association between antibiotic use and subsequent infection was examined using a multivariable logistic regression model that included information on the operated joint, age, gender, body mass index and patients' chronic diseases (according to medication data).Aim
Method
In the orthogeriatric model of care, orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians, anesthesiologists, physiotherapists and the nursing staff work together with the aim to optimize the outcomes of vulnerable older patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. It is recommended that the orthogeriatric care of hip fracture patients should be based on systematic treatment guidelines. We describe here how operative and perioperative management of hip fracture patients changed between the first and the second year after initiation of orthogeriatric collaboration. Data on all patients aged 65 years or over and experiencing a hip fracture between September 1st 2007 and August 31st 2009 were prospectively collected in a Finnish hospital district with a total of 200,000 inhabitants. The patients were evaluated 4–6 months postoperatively at the geriatric outpatient clinic. Starting from the second year, geriatrician's rounds 2–3 times a week at the orthopaedic ward were provided. In addition, a systematic treatment protocol agreed by orthopaedic surgeons, geriatricians and anesthesiologists was introduced to the hospital staff responsible for the care of hip fracture patients.Introduction
Method
Antibiotic-impregnated cement is frequently used for fixation of total knee prostheses as a measure to prevent postoperative infection. In recent years, more cementless knee prostheses have been implanted especially for younger patients. In 1997 to June 2004, 35044 primary total knee arthroplasties for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were performed in Finland and registered in nationwide arthroplasty register. The patients aged 70 years (range 21–96) on average, and 71.7% were women. During the median follow-up of 39 months (range 0–104), 978 (2.8%) knees were revised. There were 188 (0.58%), 21 (1.09%) and 10 (1.18%) reoperations due to infection after cemented, hybrid and cementless arthroplasties, respectively (p=0.003). In hybrid arthroplasties with cemented tibial component, the septic reoperation rate did not significantly differ from cemented arthroplasties. Instead, the higher number of infections after hybrid arthroplasty was related to use of cementless tibial components (5.3% vs. 0.9%, p<
0.008). In Cox regression model adjusted for age, gender and diagnosis, the hazard ratio for septic reoperation after knee replacement with cementless tibial component was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4–4.1) compared to the cemented alternative. The fixation method did not affect the rate of septic reoperations occurring after the first postoperative year. Cementless fixation of tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty may associate with an increased risk of early septic reoperation. Until this finding is confirmed in other materials, cementless fixation in primary knee arthroplasty should be used cautiously in patients with increased risk for infection.
