There remains much debate regarding the optimal method for surgical management of patients with long head of biceps pathology. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tenotomy versus tenodesis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42020198658). Electronic databases searched included EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tenotomy versus tenodesis were included. Risk of bias within studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias v2.0 tool and the Jadad score. The primary outcome included patient reported functional outcome measures pooled using standardized mean difference (SMD) and a random effects model. Secondary outcome measures included pain (visual analogue scale VAS), rate of Popeye deformity, and operative time.

860 patients from 11 RCTs (426 tenotomy vs 434 tenodesis) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of all PROMs data demonstrated comparable outcomes between tenotomy vs tenodesis (SMD 0.14, 95% CI −0.04 to 0.32; p=0.13). Sensitivity analysis comparing RCTs involving patients with and without an intact rotator cuff did not change the primary outcome. There was no significant difference for pain (VAS). Tenodesis resulted in a lower rate of Popeye deformity (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45, p < 0.00001). Tenotomy demonstrated a shorter operative time (MD 15.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 29.36, p < 0.00001).

Aside from a lower rate of cosmetic deformity, tenodesis yielded no measurable significant benefit to tenotomy for addressing pathology in the long head of biceps. A large multi-centre clinical effectiveness randomised controlled trial is needed to provide clarity in this area.

A number of classification systems exist for posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle. The reliability of these classification systems remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of three commonly utilised fracture classification systems of the posterior malleolus.

60 patients across 2 hospitals sustaining an unstable ankle fracture with a posterior malleolus fragment were identified. All patients underwent radiographs and computed tomography of their injured ankle. 9 surgeons including pre-ST3 level, ST3-8 level, and consultant level applied the Haraguchi, Rammelt, and Mason & Molloy classifications to these patients, at two timepoints, at least 4 weeks apart. The order was randomised between assessments. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Intra-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa and standard error (SE).

Inter-rater reliability (Fleiss’ Kappa) was calculated for the Haraguchi classification as 0.522 (95% CI 0.490 – 0.553), for the Rammelt classification as 0.626 (95% CI 0.600 – 0.652), and the Mason & Molloy classification as 0.541 (95% CI 0.514 – 0.569). Intra-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa) was 0.764 (SE 0.034) for the Haraguchi, 0.763 (SE 0.031) for the Rammelt, 0.688 (SE 0.035) for the Mason & Molloy classification.

This study reports the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for three classification systems for posterior malleolus fractures. Based on definitions by Landis & Koch (1977), inter-rater reliability was rated as ‘moderate’ for the Haraguchi and Mason & Molloy classifications; and ‘substantial’ for the Rammelt classification. Similarly, the intra-rater reliability was rated as ‘substantial’ for all three classifications.

Introduction and Objective

There remains much debate regarding the optimal method for surgical management of patients with long head of biceps pathology. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of tenotomy versus tenodesis.

The cervical spine is the most vulnerable segment in high velocity injuries. Bifacet dislocations are associated with significant soft tissue damage and neurological deficit. Management of delayed presentation of cervical facet dislocations, which are not uncommon, is varied. The aims of this study are to create awareness and to develop a management strategy.

We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients (10 men and four women) with chronic dislocations treated over 4 years. The mean age was 42.5 years (23 to 62). The delay in presentation ranged from 15 to 135 days. Seven patients had neurological deficit. All patients underwent CT scan and MRI.

Common areas of involvement were C6/7 (five patients) and C5/6 (four patients). Associated fracture of posterior elements was identified in 40% of patients. In two patients sequestrated disc ruptured into the canal. All patients underwent surgical reduction and stabilisation, with eight having one-stage and six two-stage surgery. The sequence of one-stage surgery was posterior release, reduction (facet reduction/facetectomy), anterior discectomy and anterior fusion. In three patients with sequestrated discs, anterior decompression preceded posterior release and finally anterior fusion. The six patients who had staged surgery had a prolonged delay (over 3 months) in presentation. Posterior release was followed by an anterior decompression, then a 7 to 10-day period of traction reduction and finally anterior fusion. None of our patients developed neurological deficit. Three patients improved from Frankel-C to Frankel-D.

We recommend that the sequence of surgery should be posterior release/reduction and then anterior decompression and anterior fusion. However, in chronic cases, staged reduction and fusion is a viable option.