INTRODUCTION

Historically, the clinical performance of novel implants was usually reported by designer surgeons who were the first to acquire clinical data. Regional and national registries now provide rapid access to survival data on new implants and drive ODEP ratings. To assess implant performance, clinical and radiological data is required in addition to implant survival. Prospective, multi-surgeon, multi-centre assessments have been advocated as the most meaningful. We report the preliminary results of such a study for the MiniHip™femoral component and Trinity™ acetabular component (Corin Ltd, UK).

In the young and highly active population of military patients, femoroacetabular impingement can be a source of serious disability as well as a threat to their career. This morbidity can be treated with hip arthroscopy with debridement of cam lesion, and excision or repair of a corresponding labral tear. We report on the long term outcomes (>1 year) of 26 military cases who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, in a single surgeon's series. Twenty two patients (four bilateral cases) underwent hip arthroscopy as a day case procedure during the period February 2013 to October 2014. Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS) were obtained from patients pre-operatively, at two months, four months and at least one year post-operatively. There was a significant improvement in NAHS at two months (75.6)(p<0.05), four months (85.1)(p<0.001) and one year (84.8)(p<0.001), compared to pre-operative NAHS (65.8). There was no significant change in NAHS beyond four months. Only three out of the 22 patients were medically discharged secondary to persistent hip symptoms. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement is an effective, viable procedure for military patients. Mobility, pain and function is significantly improved after surgery. This improvement is sustained in the long term up to and beyond one year.

Introduction

It is now widely accepted that acute knee dislocations should be managed operatively. Most published studies are from outside the UK and from major trauma or specialist centres. The aim of the study is to report the functional outcomes of all patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation at our institution all of whom were surgically managed. The results were then compared to other published series. The hypothesis being that there would be no significant difference in the functional outcome scores between the groups.

Introduction

It is now widely accepted that acute knee dislocations should be managed operatively. Most published studies are from outside the UK and from major trauma or specialist centres. The aim of the study is to report the functional outcomes of all patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation at our institution all of whom were surgically managed. The results were then compared to other published series. The hypothesis being that there would be no significant difference in the functional outcome scores between the groups.

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is an increasingly diagnosed cause of hip pain in young patients. It may progress to cause labral injury and chondral damage within the hip.

Surgery can be undertaken arthroscopically but is not universally available. Open approach to the hip with surgical dislocation, labral surgery and impingement lesion reduction is an acceptable alternative. Described by Ganz in 2001 the approach must conserve the postero-lateral blood supply to the femoral head and neck, to minimize the risk of Avascular Necrosis (AVN). Ganz recommended a sliding trochanteric osteotomy to widen access, and an anterior capsulotomy avoiding dissection postero-lateral to the femoral neck. To date there has been no published support for the Hardinge-type antero-lateral approach.

We describe a series of 26 consecutive patients with FAI, all managed by open osteochondroplasty during 2008 via a modified anterolateral approach and capsule preserving exposure. Trochanteric osteotomy was not undertaken.

The series contained 14 males and 12 females with mean ages of 33 and 29 respectively. Patients were assessed both clinically and using the Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Assessments were undertaken pre-operatively and at 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. The mean NAHS pre-op was 54. This improved to 87 at 16 weeks. 77% of our patients achieved a NAHS of 75 or greater indicating a good or excellent result. Three patients had poor outcome and progression of osteoarthritic symptoms. There were no complications from the osteochondroplasty and all patients were Trendelenberg negative by 16 weeks.

We believe hip osteochondroplasty can be safely and effectively undertaken via an anterolateral approach, without a trochanteric osteotomy.

Background: We have noted a concerning number of early failures (as defined by revision) for Preservation medial mobile-bearing uni-compartmental knee replacements (UKR’s) implanted in our hospital. This study retrospectively reviewed the postoperative radiographs to see if these were as a result of surgical technical failure.

Methods: Between 2003 and 2004, 43 medial mobile-bearing Preservation UKR’s were implanted into 39 patients. The average age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was 61.4 years (range, 46–85), (20 males). The immediate post-operative radiographs were reviewed by 2 independent orthopaedic consultants and a registrar, who were blinded to the patient outcomes, using the radiographic criteria used for the Oxford UKR. We however, particularly tried to identify any medio-lateral offset between femoral and tibial components due to the constrained nature of the prosthesis. A compound error score for all other technical errors was also calculated for each patient.

Results: Six (13.9%) of 43 knees were revised (5 for persistent pain, 1 for tibial component subsidence). Technical errors were few and no correlation was found between post-operative radiographic appearances and the subsequent need for revision. The mean compound error score (maximum value 18) was 4.5 (range, 2–9) in the revision cases and in the non revised cases 3.2 (range, 0–8).

Conclusions: We believe this study gives credence to the opinion that the DePuy Preservation mobile-bearing implant has design faults and is over-constrained leading to early failures in some cases.

Day case Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction has recently become accepted as a safe and reliable technique. One major advantage of day case procedures is the reduction of cancellations due to bed availability leading to a more predictable admission for the patient. Traditionally this advantage has not always been available to service personnel due to the combined problems of distance from the hospital and lack of a suitable and safe environment for discharge. These problems can be overcome by the close cooperation with the local Medical Reception Station.

During 2000 a total of 29 day case ACL reconstructions were performed. There were no cancellations for non-clinical reasons. Of these 29, 12 were performed on service personnel of whom 8 were based at a significant distance from the hospital. A total of 6 patients were treated via the Medical Reception Station (MRS) for overnight stay after the operation. There were no significant complications at the MRS and all patients have returned to normal duty. There were no postoperative complications in this group of patients.

We suggest that the advantages of day surgery can be extended to servicemen by the use of the MRS as a temporary accommodation. This should prevent soldiers operations from being cancelled and reduce time away from operational units. This practice could be extended to all aspects of surgery suitable for day case procedures.